MARK vs. MAXN
MARK (Remark Holdings, Inc.) and MAXN (Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MARK in Software - Infrastructure, MAXN in Solar. Over the past 5 years, MARK returned -84.54%/yr vs -78.52%/yr for MAXN. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MARK vs. MAXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARK achieves a -57.14% return, which is significantly higher than MAXN's -72.39% return.
MARK
- 1D
- -25.00%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- YTD
- -57.14%
- 6M
- -70.00%
- 1Y
- -97.44%
- 3Y*
- -89.64%
- 5Y*
- -84.54%
- 10Y*
- -64.43%
MAXN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -72.39%
- 6M
- -73.64%
- 1Y
- -75.66%
- 3Y*
- -93.57%
- 5Y*
- -78.52%
- 10Y*
- —
MARK vs. MAXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARK Remark Holdings, Inc. | -57.14% | -95.98% | -82.43% | -54.98% | -88.91% | -47.82% | 71.17% |
MAXN Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. | -72.39% | -63.53% | -98.95% | -55.35% | 15.54% | -51.00% | -24.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARK and MAXN is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020 | 0.16 |
The correlation between MARK and MAXN shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MARK:
$4.63M
MAXN:
$176.41M
MARK:
$1.15M
MAXN:
-$242.06M
MARK:
-$33.10M
MAXN:
-$504.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARK vs. MAXN — Risk / Return Rank
MARK
MAXN
MARK vs. MAXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) and Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARK | MAXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 0.89 | +0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.88 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -1.70 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARK | MAXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | -0.62 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | -0.63 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | -0.63 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
MARK vs. MAXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARK drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MAXN drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARK and MAXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARK | MAXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.99% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.21% | -85.87% | -12.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.92% | -99.98% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -99.98% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -99.99% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.09% | -77.72% | -17.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 87.46% | 44.60% | +42.86% |
Volatility
MARK vs. MAXN - Volatility Comparison
Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) has a higher volatility of 80.17% compared to Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) at 0.00%. This indicates that MARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARK | MAXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 80.17% | 0.00% | +80.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 358.73% | 107.68% | +251.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 722.60% | 122.40% | +600.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 367.92% | 124.44% | +243.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 272.77% | 123.64% | +149.13% |
Dividends
MARK vs. MAXN - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARK nor MAXN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MARK vs. MAXN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Remark Holdings, Inc. and Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MARK and MAXN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARK has higher volatility (80.17%) compared to MAXN (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARK dropped -100.00% vs MAXN's -99.99%.
MARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARK and MAXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer