MARK vs. BLIN

In the year-to-date period, MARK achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than BLIN's 16.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MARK has underperformed BLIN with an annualized return of -47.46%, while BLIN has yielded a comparatively higher -44.72% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) and Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MARK Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the BLIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARK and BLIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither MARK nor BLIN has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum MARK drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum BLIN drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARK and BLIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) and Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN) have volatilities of 24.13% and 24.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Remark Holdings, Inc. and Bridgeline Digital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.