MARK vs. BLIN
MARK (Remark Holdings, Inc.) and BLIN (Bridgeline Digital, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, MARK returned -64.43%/yr vs -39.59%/yr for BLIN. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MARK vs. BLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARK achieves a -57.14% return, which is significantly lower than BLIN's 43.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MARK has underperformed BLIN with an annualized return of -64.43%, while BLIN has yielded a comparatively higher -39.59% annualized return.
MARK
- 1D
- -25.00%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- YTD
- -57.14%
- 6M
- -70.00%
- 1Y
- -97.44%
- 3Y*
- -89.64%
- 5Y*
- -84.54%
- 10Y*
- -64.43%
BLIN
- 1D
- -4.80%
- 1M
- 21.34%
- YTD
- 43.34%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- -23.23%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- -14.92%
- 10Y*
- -39.59%
MARK vs. BLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARK Remark Holdings, Inc. | -57.14% | -95.98% | -82.43% | -54.98% | -88.91% | -47.82% | 265.38% | -57.02% | -87.56% | 148.21% |
BLIN Bridgeline Digital, Inc. | 43.34% | -47.46% | 81.61% | -17.14% | -53.54% | -12.40% | 67.53% | -86.67% | -90.49% | -24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARK and BLIN is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2007 | 0.07 |
The correlation between MARK and BLIN shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MARK:
$4.63M
BLIN:
$15.55M
MARK:
$1.15M
BLIN:
$10.20M
MARK:
-$33.10M
BLIN:
-$1.12M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARK vs. BLIN — Risk / Return Rank
MARK
BLIN
MARK vs. BLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) and Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARK | BLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 0.98 | +0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.41 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -0.70 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARK | BLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | -0.36 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | -0.19 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.24 | -0.43 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | -0.39 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
MARK vs. BLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARK drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BLIN drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARK and BLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARK | BLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.99% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.21% | -56.25% | -41.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.92% | -70.21% | -29.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -94.28% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -99.84% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -99.98% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.09% | -87.91% | -7.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 87.46% | 33.39% | +54.07% |
Volatility
MARK vs. BLIN - Volatility Comparison
Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) has a higher volatility of 80.17% compared to Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN) at 31.33%. This indicates that MARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARK | BLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 80.17% | 31.33% | +48.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 358.73% | 52.65% | +306.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 722.60% | 65.57% | +657.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 367.92% | 80.73% | +287.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 272.77% | 91.91% | +180.86% |
Dividends
MARK vs. BLIN - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARK nor BLIN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MARK vs. BLIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Remark Holdings, Inc. and Bridgeline Digital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MARK and BLIN have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARK has higher volatility (80.17%) compared to BLIN (31.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARK dropped -100.00% vs BLIN's -99.99%.
MARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARK and BLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer