MARK vs. BLIN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) and Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN).

Performance

MARK vs. BLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) and Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MARK vs. BLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MARK Remark Holdings, Inc.	-68.57%	-95.98%	-82.43%	-54.98%	-88.91%	-47.82%	265.38%	-57.02%	-87.56%	148.21%
BLIN Bridgeline Digital, Inc.	8.43%	-47.46%	81.61%	-17.14%	-53.54%	-12.40%	67.53%	-86.67%	-90.49%	-24.41%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) MARK : $4.63M BLIN : $15.51M
Gross Profit (TTM) MARK : $1.15M BLIN : $9.52M
EBITDA (TTM) MARK : -$33.10M BLIN : -$1.09M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARK achieves a -68.57% return, which is significantly lower than BLIN's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MARK has underperformed BLIN with an annualized return of -65.56%, while BLIN has yielded a comparatively higher -42.03% annualized return.

MARK

• 1D: -26.67%
• 1M: 10.00%
• YTD: -68.57%
• 6M: -78.43%
• 1Y: -97.60%
• 3Y*: -90.71%
• 5Y*: -86.43%
• 10Y*: -65.56%

BLIN

• 1D: 12.95%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 6M: -31.80%
• 1Y: -44.09%
• 3Y*: -0.36%
• 5Y*: -20.86%
• 10Y*: -42.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MARK vs. BLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARK

MARK Risk / Return Rank: 50
MARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MARK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MARK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

BLIN

BLIN Risk / Return Rank: 17
BLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
BLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARK vs. BLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) and Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARK	BLIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	-0.66	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.37	-0.81	+6.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	0.90	+0.97
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.58	-0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	-0.90	-0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MARK vs. BLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARK Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the BLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARK and BLIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARK	BLIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	-0.66	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	-0.26	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.23	-0.46	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	-0.41	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between MARK and BLIN is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MARK vs. BLIN - Dividend Comparison

Neither MARK nor BLIN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MARK vs. BLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARK drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BLIN drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARK and BLIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARK	BLIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-99.99%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.49%	-67.29%	-31.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-100.00%	-94.28%	-5.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-100.00%	-99.84%	-0.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-99.99%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-95.04%	-87.80%	-7.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	78.96%	43.56%	+35.40%

Volatility

MARK vs. BLIN - Volatility Comparison

Remark Holdings, Inc. (MARK) has a higher volatility of 171.89% compared to Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (BLIN) at 18.75%. This indicates that MARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARK	BLIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	171.89%	18.75%	+153.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	321.03%	47.82%	+273.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	790.80%	67.57%	+723.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	394.92%	79.72%	+315.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	290.79%	91.43%	+199.36%

Financials