PortfoliosLab logo
MAPS vs. EGAN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MAPS and EGAN is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MAPS vs. EGAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) and eGain Corporation (EGAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MAPS:

0.12

EGAN:

-0.16

Sortino Ratio

MAPS:

0.78

EGAN:

0.10

Omega Ratio

MAPS:

1.09

EGAN:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

MAPS:

0.10

EGAN:

-0.11

Martin Ratio

MAPS:

0.50

EGAN:

-0.43

Ulcer Index

MAPS:

20.42%

EGAN:

26.30%

Daily Std Dev

MAPS:

70.90%

EGAN:

56.07%

Max Drawdown

MAPS:

-97.85%

EGAN:

-99.97%

Current Drawdown

MAPS:

-96.38%

EGAN:

-99.21%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAPS:

$175.81M

EGAN:

$151.24M

EPS

MAPS:

$0.09

EGAN:

$0.10

PE Ratio

MAPS:

11.56

EGAN:

53.90

PS Ratio

MAPS:

0.95

EGAN:

1.73

PB Ratio

MAPS:

2.28

EGAN:

2.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAPS:

$184.74M

EGAN:

$87.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAPS:

$175.78M

EGAN:

$60.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

MAPS:

$30.52M

EGAN:

$4.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPS achieves a -24.64% return, which is significantly lower than EGAN's -13.48% return.


MAPS

YTD

-24.64%

1M

-17.46%

6M

-12.61%

1Y

5.14%

3Y*

-43.12%

5Y*

-36.32%

10Y*

N/A

EGAN

YTD

-13.48%

1M

11.83%

6M

1.13%

1Y

-12.64%

3Y*

-16.11%

5Y*

-12.33%

10Y*

0.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WM Technology, Inc.

eGain Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAPS vs. EGAN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAPS is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAPS is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAPS is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAPS is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAPS is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAPS is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

EGAN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EGAN is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EGAN is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EGAN is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EGAN is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EGAN is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EGAN is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MAPS vs. EGAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) and eGain Corporation (EGAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MAPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the EGAN Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPS and EGAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MAPS vs. EGAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAPS nor EGAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MAPS vs. EGAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPS drawdown since its inception was -97.85%, roughly equal to the maximum EGAN drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPS and EGAN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MAPS vs. EGAN - Volatility Comparison

WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) and eGain Corporation (EGAN) have volatilities of 16.34% and 16.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MAPS vs. EGAN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WM Technology, Inc. and eGain Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M20212022202320242025
44.61M
21.01M
(MAPS) Total Revenue
(EGAN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MAPS vs. EGAN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WM Technology, Inc. and eGain Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
95.0%
68.0%
(MAPS) Gross Margin
(EGAN) Gross Margin
MAPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, WM Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 42.37M and revenue of 44.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.

EGAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, eGain Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.29M and revenue of 21.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.

MAPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, WM Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.65M and revenue of 44.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

EGAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, eGain Corporation reported an operating income of 27.00K and revenue of 21.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.

MAPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, WM Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 1.65M and revenue of 44.61M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

EGAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, eGain Corporation reported a net income of 574.00K and revenue of 21.01M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.