MAPS vs. EGAN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) and eGain Corporation (EGAN).

Performance

MAPS vs. EGAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) and eGain Corporation (EGAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAPS vs. EGAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MAPS WM Technology, Inc.	-17.74%	-40.21%	91.59%	-28.68%	-83.11%	-53.17%	28.86%	1.02%
EGAN eGain Corporation	-24.39%	65.17%	-25.21%	-7.75%	-9.52%	-15.50%	49.12%	1.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MAPS : $73.89M EGAN : $220.56M
EPS MAPS : $0.02 EGAN : $1.29
PE Ratio MAPS : 37.58 EGAN : 6.01
PS Ratio MAPS : 0.42 EGAN : 2.39
PB Ratio MAPS : 1.29 EGAN : 2.48
Total Revenue (TTM) MAPS : $174.70M EGAN : $90.73M
Gross Profit (TTM) MAPS : $165.87M EGAN : $65.65M
EBITDA (TTM) MAPS : $19.45M EGAN : $9.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPS achieves a -17.74% return, which is significantly higher than EGAN's -24.39% return.

MAPS

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: -17.74%
• 6M: -41.49%
• 1Y: -39.94%
• 3Y*: -7.20%
• 5Y*: -49.27%
• 10Y*: —

EGAN

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -16.43%
• YTD: -24.39%
• 6M: -11.99%
• 1Y: 61.08%
• 3Y*: 0.83%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MAPS vs. EGAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPS

MAPS Risk / Return Rank: 15
MAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
MAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
MAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

EGAN

EGAN Risk / Return Rank: 67
EGAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EGAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
EGAN Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EGAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EGAN Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAPS vs. EGAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) and eGain Corporation (EGAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAPS	EGAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	0.91	-1.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.62	1.63	-2.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.21	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	1.21	-1.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	2.64	-4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAPS vs. EGAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the EGAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPS and EGAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAPS	EGAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	0.91	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.55	-0.08	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	-0.11	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between MAPS and EGAN is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MAPS vs. EGAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAPS nor EGAN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MAPS vs. EGAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPS drawdown since its inception was -97.88%, roughly equal to the maximum EGAN drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPS and EGAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAPS	EGAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.88%	-99.97%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.21%	-50.13%	-3.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.10%	-66.14%	-30.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-77.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.64%	-98.86%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.37%	-97.20%	+28.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.33%	22.88%	+5.45%

Volatility

MAPS vs. EGAN - Volatility Comparison

WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) has a higher volatility of 17.79% compared to eGain Corporation (EGAN) at 11.12%. This indicates that MAPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAPS	EGAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.79%	11.12%	+6.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.38%	51.42%	-9.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.52%	67.12%	+2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.36%	53.50%	+36.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.24%	63.43%	+19.81%

Financials

MAPS vs. EGAN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WM Technology, Inc. and eGain Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MAPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WM Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 40.88M and revenue of 43.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.9%.

EGAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, eGain Corporation reported a gross profit of 16.81M and revenue of 22.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.

MAPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WM Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.81M and revenue of 43.07M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.5%.

EGAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, eGain Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05M and revenue of 22.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.9%.

MAPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WM Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -3.57M and revenue of 43.07M, resulting in a net margin of -8.3%.

EGAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, eGain Corporation reported a net income of 2.34M and revenue of 22.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.