MAGS vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
MAGS and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAGS or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and SCHG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MAGS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MAGS:
2.70
SCHG:
2.22
MAGS:
3.31
SCHG:
2.86
MAGS:
1.45
SCHG:
1.40
MAGS:
3.80
SCHG:
3.13
MAGS:
12.31
SCHG:
12.34
MAGS:
5.58%
SCHG:
3.14%
MAGS:
25.45%
SCHG:
17.45%
MAGS:
-18.10%
SCHG:
-34.59%
MAGS:
-4.00%
SCHG:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 67.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 37.04% return.
MAGS
67.14%
8.16%
25.90%
66.48%
N/A
N/A
SCHG
37.04%
3.40%
12.88%
37.14%
20.24%
16.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAGS vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MAGS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MAGS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 0.26% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -18.10%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MAGS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.07%. This indicates that MAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.