MAGN vs. MAGS
MAGN (Magnera Corporation) is a stock, while MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, MAGN returned -32.92%/yr vs 30.30%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAGN vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGN achieves a -14.20% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 1.56% return.
MAGN
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- 6M
- -11.81%
- YTD
- -14.20%
- 1Y
- -1.59%
- 3Y*
- -32.92%
- 5Y*
- -40.57%
- 10Y*
- -24.81%
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 30.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGN vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGN Magnera Corporation | -14.20% | -16.68% | -27.95% | -41.92% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.56% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGN and MAGS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGN vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
MAGN
MAGS
MAGN vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magnera Corporation (MAGN) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.18 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 1.13 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 3.48 | -3.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGN vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGN drawdown since its inception was -97.49%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGN and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.49% | -29.91% | -67.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.02% | -18.62% | -23.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.60% | -29.91% | -52.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.91% | -5.57% | -90.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.17% | -4.81% | -26.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.20% | 6.01% | +16.19% |
Volatility
MAGN vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Magnera Corporation (MAGN) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 7.85%. This indicates that MAGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGN | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.94% | 7.85% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.94% | 16.45% | +17.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.64% | 21.23% | +39.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.23% | 26.01% | +55.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.00% | 26.01% | +38.99% |
Dividends
MAGN vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
MAGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGN Magnera Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.07% | 3.23% | 4.06% | 2.84% | 5.33% | 1.82% | 2.09% | 2.60% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.46% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGN and MAGS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGN has higher volatility (10.94%) compared to MAGS (7.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGN dropped -97.49% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGN and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer