MAG vs. SI=F
Compare and contrast key facts about MAG Silver Corp. (MAG) and Silver (SI=F).
Performance
MAG vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAG vs. SI=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAG MAG Silver Corp. | 0.00% | 85.31% | 30.64% | -33.40% | -0.26% | -23.64% | 73.31% | 62.19% | -40.94% | 12.06% |
SI=F Silver | 6.11% | 141.44% | 21.41% | 0.19% | 2.95% | -11.59% | 47.38% | 15.32% | -9.36% | 7.23% |
Returns By Period
MAG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SI=F
- 1D
- 6.16%
- 1M
- -15.68%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 58.42%
- 1Y
- 118.37%
- 3Y*
- 45.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.59%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAG vs. SI=F — Risk / Return Rank
MAG
SI=F
MAG vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAG Silver Corp. (MAG) and Silver (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAG | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.22 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between MAG and SI=F is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Drawdowns
MAG vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAG | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -91.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -34.94% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -61.14% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.41% | — |
Volatility
MAG vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAG | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 62.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 58.92% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 37.21% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 33.13% | — |