MACSX vs. MGLBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund (MACSX) and Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX).
MACSX is managed by Matthews Asia Funds. It was launched on Sep 11, 1994. MGLBX is managed by Marsico Investment Fund. It was launched on Jun 28, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MACSX or MGLBX.
Correlation
The correlation between MACSX and MGLBX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MACSX vs. MGLBX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MACSX:
1.10
MGLBX:
1.58
MACSX:
1.63
MGLBX:
2.18
MACSX:
1.20
MGLBX:
1.28
MACSX:
0.40
MGLBX:
1.18
MACSX:
2.95
MGLBX:
9.04
MACSX:
4.56%
MGLBX:
3.35%
MACSX:
12.17%
MGLBX:
19.20%
MACSX:
-51.39%
MGLBX:
-59.43%
MACSX:
-23.76%
MGLBX:
-2.08%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MACSX achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than MGLBX's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, MACSX has underperformed MGLBX with an annualized return of -0.63%, while MGLBX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.36% annualized return.
MACSX
2.40%
2.40%
4.97%
12.43%
-0.27%
-0.63%
MGLBX
8.76%
2.62%
14.06%
31.85%
8.33%
7.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MACSX vs. MGLBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MACSX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MGLBX's 1.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MACSX vs. MGLBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MACSX
MGLBX
MACSX vs. MGLBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund (MACSX) and Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MACSX vs. MGLBX - Dividend Comparison
MACSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while MGLBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MACSX Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund | 3.43% | 3.52% | 2.74% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.50% | 2.26% | 2.32% | 2.64% | 3.19% | 2.62% | 1.93% |
MGLBX Marsico Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MACSX vs. MGLBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MACSX drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, smaller than the maximum MGLBX drawdown of -59.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACSX and MGLBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MACSX vs. MGLBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund (MACSX) is 3.02%, while Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that MACSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGLBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.