MAC vs. V

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Macerich Company (MAC) and Visa Inc. (V).

Performance

MAC vs. V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macerich Company (MAC) and Visa Inc. (V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAC vs. V - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MAC Macerich Company	3.32%	-3.72%	34.48%	45.69%	-31.57%	68.49%	-56.69%	-32.18%	-30.56%	-2.81%
V Visa Inc.	-13.64%	11.76%	22.32%	26.31%	-3.40%	-0.31%	17.12%	43.33%	16.49%	47.18%

Fundamentals

EPS MAC : -$0.77 V : $15.10
PS Ratio MAC : 4.75 V : 10.06
Total Revenue (TTM) MAC : $1.01B V : $41.39B
Gross Profit (TTM) MAC : $967.36M V : $24.66B
EBITDA (TTM) MAC : $637.82M V : $26.20B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAC achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than V's -13.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MAC has underperformed V with an annualized return of -8.61%, while V has yielded a comparatively higher 15.37% annualized return.

MAC

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -6.82%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 5.76%
• 1Y: 14.35%
• 3Y*: 26.91%
• 5Y*: 14.63%
• 10Y*: -8.61%

V

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -5.59%
• YTD: -13.64%
• 6M: -11.11%
• 1Y: -13.11%
• 3Y*: 11.10%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: 15.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MAC vs. V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAC

MAC Risk / Return Rank: 54
MAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MAC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MAC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

V

V Risk / Return Rank: 19
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
V Omega Ratio Rank: 17
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
V Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAC vs. V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macerich Company (MAC) and Visa Inc. (V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAC	V	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	-0.56	+0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	-0.63	+1.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.91	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	-0.55	+1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.79	-1.20	+2.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAC vs. V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the V Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAC and V, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAC	V	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	-0.56	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.34	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.18	0.63	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.68	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between MAC and V is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MAC vs. V - Dividend Comparison

MAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than V's 0.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAC Macerich Company	3.60%	3.68%	3.41%	4.41%	5.51%	3.47%	10.78%	11.14%	6.86%	4.37%	3.88%	5.74%
V Visa Inc.	0.83%	0.70%	0.68%	0.72%	0.76%	0.62%	0.56%	0.56%	0.67%	0.61%	0.75%	0.64%

Drawdowns

MAC vs. V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAC drawdown since its inception was -93.29%, which is greater than V's maximum drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAC and V.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAC	V	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.29%	-51.90%	-41.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.24%	-20.38%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.71%	-28.60%	-35.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-92.91%	-36.36%	-56.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.19%	-18.57%	-45.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.39%	-8.20%	-21.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.36%	9.29%	-0.93%

Volatility

MAC vs. V - Volatility Comparison

Macerich Company (MAC) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to Visa Inc. (V) at 5.55%. This indicates that MAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAC	V	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.60%	5.55%	+5.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.43%	15.39%	+6.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.17%	23.81%	+14.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.76%	22.47%	+19.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.67%	24.32%	+24.35%

Financials