PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MAC vs. SPG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MACSPG
YTD Return30.87%29.85%
1Y Return100.12%62.65%
3Y Return (Ann)2.39%8.73%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.48%8.86%
10Y Return (Ann)-6.44%4.95%
Sharpe Ratio2.342.85
Sortino Ratio2.903.84
Omega Ratio1.381.48
Calmar Ratio1.162.44
Martin Ratio11.1017.21
Ulcer Index8.60%3.66%
Daily Std Dev40.78%22.08%
Max Drawdown-93.38%-77.00%
Current Drawdown-64.96%-1.72%

Fundamentals


MACSPG
Market Cap$4.57B$68.09B
EPS$0.36$7.52
PE Ratio53.8324.11
PEG Ratio-485.006.14
Total Revenue (TTM)$882.39M$5.91B
Gross Profit (TTM)$626.79M$4.32B
EBITDA (TTM)$360.92M$4.31B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between MAC and SPG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MAC vs. SPG - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MAC having a 30.87% return and SPG slightly lower at 29.85%. Over the past 10 years, MAC has underperformed SPG with an annualized return of -6.44%, while SPG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.95% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.14%
22.27%
MAC
SPG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAC vs. SPG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macerich Company (MAC) and Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAC, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAC, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MAC, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAC, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MAC, currently valued at 11.10, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.10
SPG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SPG, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SPG, currently valued at 3.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SPG, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SPG, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.44
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SPG, currently valued at 17.21, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0017.21

MAC vs. SPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAC and SPG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.34
2.85
MAC
SPG

Dividends

MAC vs. SPG - Dividend Comparison

MAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than SPG's 4.43% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MAC
Macerich Company
3.51%4.41%5.51%3.47%10.78%11.14%6.86%4.37%3.88%9.06%3.01%4.01%
SPG
Simon Property Group, Inc.
4.43%5.22%5.87%3.66%7.04%5.57%4.70%4.16%3.66%3.11%2.74%3.06%

Drawdowns

MAC vs. SPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAC drawdown since its inception was -93.38%, which is greater than SPG's maximum drawdown of -77.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAC and SPG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-64.96%
-1.72%
MAC
SPG

Volatility

MAC vs. SPG - Volatility Comparison

Macerich Company (MAC) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) at 5.96%. This indicates that MAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.84%
5.96%
MAC
SPG

Financials

MAC vs. SPG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Macerich Company and Simon Property Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items