Correlation
The correlation between MA and PG is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
MA vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Mastercard Inc (MA) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MA or PG.
Performance
MA vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MA:
1.58
PG:
0.37
MA:
2.07
PG:
0.58
MA:
1.30
PG:
1.08
MA:
1.93
PG:
0.57
MA:
8.31
PG:
1.25
MA:
3.89%
PG:
5.37%
MA:
21.25%
PG:
19.16%
MA:
-62.67%
PG:
-54.23%
MA:
-0.14%
PG:
-4.27%
Fundamentals
MA:
$527.78B
PG:
$398.31B
MA:
$14.46
PG:
$6.35
MA:
40.50
PG:
26.75
MA:
2.32
PG:
4.11
MA:
18.16
PG:
4.75
MA:
78.65
PG:
7.74
MA:
$29.07B
PG:
$83.93B
MA:
$22.22B
PG:
$43.05B
MA:
$17.36B
PG:
$23.39B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 2.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MA has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 20.91%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.07% annualized return.
MA
11.55%
7.13%
10.22%
31.76%
18.55%
14.89%
20.91%
PG
2.61%
6.19%
-4.04%
5.79%
7.41%
10.64%
11.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MA vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MA
PG
MA vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Inc (MA) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MA vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than PG's 2.40% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Inc | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.51% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
MA vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and PG.
Loading data...
Volatility
MA vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Mastercard Inc (MA) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) have volatilities of 4.93% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
MA vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Inc and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MA vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
MA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mastercard Inc reported a gross profit of 5.56B and revenue of 7.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.7%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 19.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.
MA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mastercard Inc reported an operating income of 4.15B and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 57.2%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.56B and revenue of 19.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
MA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mastercard Inc reported a net income of 3.28B and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in a net margin of 45.2%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.77B and revenue of 19.78B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.