PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZ vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LZ vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZ achieves a -39.07% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 14.77% return.


LZ

1D
-7.35%
1M
-10.90%
YTD
-39.07%
6M
-36.32%
1Y
-34.10%
3Y*
-19.83%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOGL

1D
-0.79%
1M
-6.33%
YTD
14.77%
6M
12.47%
1Y
116.77%
3Y*
42.66%
5Y*
24.78%
10Y*
25.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZ vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LZ
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
-39.07%32.22%-33.54%45.99%-51.84%-57.54%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
14.77%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%18.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LZ and GOOGL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.32

The correlation between LZ and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LZ:

$1.07B

GOOGL:

$4.39T

EPS

LZ:

$0.06

GOOGL:

$13.11

PE Ratio

LZ:

96.41

GOOGL:

27.37

PEG Ratio

LZ:

2.68

GOOGL:

1.35

PS Ratio

LZ:

1.41

GOOGL:

10.38

PB Ratio

LZ:

7.29

GOOGL:

9.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

LZ:

$779.71M

GOOGL:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LZ:

$513.79M

GOOGL:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

LZ:

$61.20M

GOOGL:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZ vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZ
LZ Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
LZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZ vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LZGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.65

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

5.77

-6.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

21.31

-22.62

LZ vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZ and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LZGOOGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

4.03

-4.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.53

0.84

-1.37

Drawdowns

LZ vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZ drawdown since its inception was -86.25%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZ and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.25%

-65.29%

-20.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.98%

-20.37%

-30.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.67%

-29.81%

-34.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.82%

-10.84%

-73.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-13.02%

-57.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.97%

5.50%

+20.47%

Volatility

LZ vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 8.29%. This indicates that LZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.00%

8.29%

+8.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.20%

20.56%

+19.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.27%

29.22%

+26.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.43%

31.29%

+27.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.43%

29.10%

+29.33%

Dividends

LZ vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

LZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.23%0.27%0.32%
LZ
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LZ vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
206.78M
109.90B
(LZ) Total Revenue
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LZ vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
64.0%
62.5%
Portfolio components
LZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LegalZoom.com, Inc. reported a gross profit of 132.25M and revenue of 206.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.0%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

LZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LegalZoom.com, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.76M and revenue of 206.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

LZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LegalZoom.com, Inc. reported a net income of 1.10M and revenue of 206.78M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LZ and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZ has higher volatility (17.00%) compared to GOOGL (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZ dropped -86.25% vs GOOGL's -65.29%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZ and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer