PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYV vs. MCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYV vs. MCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYV achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than MCK's -5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LYV has outperformed MCK with an annualized return of 20.53%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively lower 16.30% annualized return.


LYV

1D
-0.58%
1M
-4.62%
YTD
12.33%
6M
14.89%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
24.48%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
20.53%

MCK

1D
2.47%
1M
4.42%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-3.89%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
26.44%
5Y*
32.53%
10Y*
16.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYV vs. MCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
12.33%10.04%38.35%34.21%-41.73%62.89%2.81%45.12%15.69%60.04%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
-5.26%44.54%23.67%24.13%51.82%44.23%27.06%26.72%-28.40%11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LYV and MCK is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2005

0.26

The correlation between LYV and MCK shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYV:

$37.20B

MCK:

$95.17B

EPS

LYV:

$0.36

MCK:

$38.38

PE Ratio

LYV:

448.17

MCK:

20.21

PEG Ratio

LYV:

5.72

MCK:

0.27

PS Ratio

LYV:

1.46

MCK:

0.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYV:

$25.61B

MCK:

$403.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYV:

$10.31B

MCK:

$14.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYV:

$1.55B

MCK:

$6.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYV vs. MCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYV
LYV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYV Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MCK
MCK Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCK Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYV vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYVMCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.09

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.35

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

0.95

-0.02

LYV vs. MCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYV Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the MCK Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYV and MCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYVMCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

0.33

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

1.35

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.45

-0.14

Drawdowns

LYV vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYV drawdown since its inception was -89.94%, which is greater than MCK's maximum drawdown of -82.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYV and MCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYVMCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.94%

-82.84%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.84%

-27.17%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-27.17%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.16%

-27.17%

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.23%

-44.23%

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-22.01%

+13.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.99%

-28.65%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.93%

9.96%

+1.97%

Volatility

LYV vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) is 5.88%, while McKesson Corporation (MCK) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that LYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYVMCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

6.94%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.76%

22.76%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.83%

29.08%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.16%

24.20%

+10.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.31%

28.82%

+9.49%

Dividends

LYV vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison

LYV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.42%0.37%0.47%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%

Financials

LYV vs. MCK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
3.79B
96.30B
(LYV) Total Revenue
(MCK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LYV vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and McKesson Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
4.2%
Portfolio components
LYV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 96.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.2%.

LYV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of -370.52M and revenue of 3.79B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.8%.

MCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 2.09B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

LYV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of -389.10M and revenue of 3.79B, resulting in a net margin of -10.3%.

MCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.68B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYV and MCK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCK has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to LYV (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYV dropped -89.94% vs MCK's -82.84%.

LYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYV and MCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer