LYSDY vs. RING

In the year-to-date period, LYSDY achieves a 30.89% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 48.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSDY has outperformed RING with an annualized return of 28.54%, while RING has yielded a comparatively lower 11.66% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LYSDY Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSDY and RING, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LYSDY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.

The maximum LYSDY drawdown since its inception was -99.53%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSDY and RING.

The current volatility for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) is 12.05%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 13.32%. This indicates that LYSDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.