PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYSDY vs. RING
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LYSDY vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LYSDY vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR
64.93%109.37%-18.22%-8.17%-29.21%144.41%79.88%50.87%489.58%258.76%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
12.19%164.72%15.98%12.29%-15.40%-7.46%24.98%49.92%-13.14%10.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYSDY achieves a 64.93% return, which is significantly higher than RING's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSDY has outperformed RING with an annualized return of 74.87%, while RING has yielded a comparatively lower 18.50% annualized return.


LYSDY

1D
1.19%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
64.93%
6M
20.39%
1Y
204.46%
3Y*
47.62%
5Y*
23.78%
10Y*
74.87%

RING

1D
4.61%
1M
-16.59%
YTD
12.19%
6M
26.66%
1Y
117.81%
3Y*
50.83%
5Y*
26.12%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYSDY vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYSDY
LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RING
RING Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYSDY vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYSDYRINGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

2.53

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

2.66

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

3.91

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.61

13.93

-4.32

LYSDY vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSDY Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the RING Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSDY and RING, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYSDYRINGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

2.53

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.73

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.50

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.13

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between LYSDY and RING is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LYSDY vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

LYSDY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
0.75%0.84%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.83%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.41%0.96%

Drawdowns

LYSDY vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSDY drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSDY and RING.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LYSDYRINGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-79.47%

-20.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.39%

-30.11%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

-47.94%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.35%

-52.04%

-20.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.67%

-16.90%

-33.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.92%

-47.74%

-37.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.86%

8.45%

+13.41%

Volatility

LYSDY vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) has a higher volatility of 18.70% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 16.89%. This indicates that LYSDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LYSDYRINGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.70%

16.89%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.18%

38.80%

+14.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.71%

46.82%

+19.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.34%

35.87%

+14.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

279.44%

36.87%

+242.57%