LYSDY vs. RING

Last updated Jul 29, 2026

LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR) is a stock, while RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, LYSDY returned 66.90%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for RING. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

LYSDY vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYSDY achieves a 21.64% return, which is significantly higher than RING's -12.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSDY has outperformed RING with an annualized return of 66.90%, while RING has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.

LYSDY

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -21.22%
• 6M: -11.75%
• YTD: 21.64%
• 1Y: 42.29%
• 3Y*: 32.45%
• 5Y*: 13.89%
• 10Y*: 66.90%
• ALL TIME*: 4.67%

RING

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -3.26%
• 6M: -31.37%
• YTD: -12.69%
• 1Y: 45.04%
• 3Y*: 41.06%
• 5Y*: 19.21%
• 10Y*: 11.08%
• ALL TIME*: 2.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	$3.20M	$3.05M	$3.26M
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	$68.92M	$45.59M	$41.69M

LYSDY vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	21.64%	109.37%	-18.22%	-8.17%	-29.21%	144.41%	79.88%	50.87%	489.58%	258.76%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-12.69%	164.72%	15.98%	12.29%	-15.40%	-7.46%	24.98%	49.92%	-13.14%	10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LYSDY and RING is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012	0.15

Over the past year, LYSDY and RING have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

LYSDY vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYSDY

LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 66
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 65

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 35
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYSDY vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LYSDY	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	0.93	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.38	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.19	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	1.17	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.79	2.63	-0.85

LYSDY vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSDY Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the RING Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSDY and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LYSDY vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSDY drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSDY and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYSDY	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-79.47%	-20.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.39%	-38.61%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.39%	-38.61%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.25%	-47.94%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.35%	-52.04%	-20.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.62%	-35.33%	-28.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.28%	-47.25%	-37.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.73%	17.16%	+6.57%

Volatility

LYSDY vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) has a higher volatility of 13.69% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 11.27%. This indicates that LYSDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYSDY	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.69%	11.27%	+2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.11%	39.52%	+2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.20%	48.60%	+15.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.48%	37.23%	+13.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	278.35%	36.64%	+241.71%

Dividends

LYSDY vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

LYSDY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	1.42%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYSDY and RING in my portfolio?

LYSDY and RING have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LYSDY or RING?

LYSDY has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to RING (11.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSDY dropped -99.93% vs RING's -79.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.