LYPG.DE vs. CNX1.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L).
LYPG.DE and CNX1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LYPG.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Information Technology. It was launched on Aug 16, 2010. CNX1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both LYPG.DE and CNX1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LYPG.DE or CNX1.L.
Key characteristics
| LYPG.DE | CNX1.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.45% | 12.15% |
| 1Y Return | 33.06% | 19.59% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.74% | 10.43% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 21.83% | 18.96% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 21.89% | 20.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.80 | 1.31 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.01% | 16.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.83% | -27.56% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.40% | -7.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYPG.DE and CNX1.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LYPG.DE vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly higher than CNX1.L's 12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE has outperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of 21.89%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively lower 20.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LYPG.DE vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYPG.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LYPG.DE vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LYPG.DE vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYPG.DE nor CNX1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LYPG.DE vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than CNX1.L's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and CNX1.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LYPG.DE vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) at 5.96%. This indicates that LYPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.