LYMS.DE vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
LYMS.DE and VONG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LYMS.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Jan 17, 2019. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. Both LYMS.DE and VONG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LYMS.DE or VONG.
Key characteristics
| LYMS.DE | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.60% | 20.71% |
| 1Y Return | 24.11% | 33.02% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.61% | 9.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.98% | 18.82% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 19.13% | 15.90% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.59 | 1.93 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.47% | 16.97% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.00% | -32.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.89% | -4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMS.DE and VONG is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LYMS.DE vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LYMS.DE achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMS.DE has outperformed VONG with an annualized return of 19.13%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.90% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LYMS.DE vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMS.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LYMS.DE vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LYMS.DE vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
LYMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% | 0.71% | 0.48% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.63% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
LYMS.DE vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.00%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMS.DE and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LYMS.DE vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 5.45%. This indicates that LYMS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.