LYB vs. WM
LYB (LyondellBasell Industries N.V.) and WM (Waste Management, Inc.) are both stocks. LYB operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while WM operates in Waste Management (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LYB returned 4.82%/yr vs 15.42%/yr for WM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LYB vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYB achieves a 32.55% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LYB has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 4.82%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.42% annualized return.
LYB
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- -18.66%
- YTD
- 32.55%
- 6M
- 33.88%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- -8.15%
- 5Y*
- -4.93%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
WM
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- -3.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
LYB vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | 32.55% | -35.96% | -17.38% | 20.70% | -0.98% | 5.07% | 2.64% | 44.63% | -21.69% | 33.72% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 2.46% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYB and WM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2010 | 0.30 |
The correlation between LYB and WM shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LYB:
-$3.19
WM:
$6.91
LYB:
0.61
WM:
3.55
LYB:
$22.48B
WM:
$25.41B
LYB:
-$4.33B
WM:
$5.61B
LYB:
$935.00M
WM:
$6.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYB vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank
LYB
WM
LYB vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYB | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.99 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | -0.19 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | -0.41 | +0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYB vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYB drawdown since its inception was -63.26%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYB and WM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYB | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.26% | -77.85% | +14.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.45% | -16.70% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.35% | -18.14% | -37.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.35% | -18.14% | -37.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.26% | -30.07% | -33.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.79% | -8.68% | -29.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.15% | -17.68% | +2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.57% | 7.74% | +12.83% |
Volatility
LYB vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 6.86%. This indicates that LYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYB | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 6.86% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.33% | 14.33% | +20.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.12% | 19.31% | +26.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 18.67% | +14.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.78% | 19.57% | +17.21% |
Dividends
LYB vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
LYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than WM's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYB LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | 7.34% | 12.59% | 7.10% | 5.20% | 11.92% | 4.81% | 4.58% | 20.27% | 4.81% | 3.22% | 3.88% | 3.50% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
LYB vs. WM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LyondellBasell Industries N.V. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LYB and WM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LYB has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to WM (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYB dropped -63.26% vs WM's -77.85%.
LYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYB and WM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer