PortfoliosLab logo
LXFR vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LXFR and MSFT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LXFR vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LXFR:

-0.02

MSFT:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

LXFR:

0.28

MSFT:

0.62

Omega Ratio

LXFR:

1.03

MSFT:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

LXFR:

-0.01

MSFT:

0.33

Martin Ratio

LXFR:

-0.05

MSFT:

0.73

Ulcer Index

LXFR:

14.76%

MSFT:

10.70%

Daily Std Dev

LXFR:

41.18%

MSFT:

25.79%

Max Drawdown

LXFR:

-67.48%

MSFT:

-69.39%

Current Drawdown

LXFR:

-48.09%

MSFT:

-0.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LXFR:

$311.32M

MSFT:

$3.42T

EPS

LXFR:

$0.78

MSFT:

$12.98

PE Ratio

LXFR:

14.65

MSFT:

35.47

PEG Ratio

LXFR:

1.43

MSFT:

2.16

PS Ratio

LXFR:

0.78

MSFT:

12.67

PB Ratio

LXFR:

1.37

MSFT:

10.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

LXFR:

$399.50M

MSFT:

$270.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LXFR:

$88.70M

MSFT:

$186.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

LXFR:

$59.10M

MSFT:

$150.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LXFR achieves a -10.74% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LXFR has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 2.45%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.46% annualized return.


LXFR

YTD

-10.74%

1M

2.51%

6M

-18.63%

1Y

-3.18%

3Y*

-7.98%

5Y*

-0.29%

10Y*

2.45%

MSFT

YTD

9.64%

1M

8.42%

6M

9.13%

1Y

11.75%

3Y*

20.19%

5Y*

21.26%

10Y*

27.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Luxfer Holdings PLC

Microsoft Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LXFR vs. MSFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LXFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LXFR is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LXFR is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LXFR is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LXFR is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LXFR is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LXFR is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFT is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LXFR vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LXFR Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LXFR and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LXFR vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

LXFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than MSFT's 0.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LXFR
Luxfer Holdings PLC
4.55%3.97%5.82%3.75%2.59%3.05%2.70%2.84%3.16%5.74%4.07%2.68%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%

Drawdowns

LXFR vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LXFR drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXFR and MSFT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LXFR vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Luxfer Holdings PLC (LXFR) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 8.33%. This indicates that LXFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LXFR vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Luxfer Holdings PLC and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
97.00M
70.07B
(LXFR) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LXFR vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Luxfer Holdings PLC and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
22.1%
68.7%
(LXFR) Gross Margin
(MSFT) Gross Margin
LXFR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Luxfer Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 21.40M and revenue of 97.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 48.15B and revenue of 70.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.

LXFR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Luxfer Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 7.60M and revenue of 97.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.8%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 32.00B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.7%.

LXFR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Luxfer Holdings PLC reported a net income of 5.50M and revenue of 97.00M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 25.82B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.