LW vs. XLP
LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. Over the past 5 years, LW returned -11.38%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for XLP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LW vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 5.94% return.
LW
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- -28.31%
- 1Y
- -21.84%
- 3Y*
- -26.76%
- 5Y*
- -11.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XLP
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- YTD
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 1.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
LW vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 1.05% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.94% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LW and XLP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2016 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LW vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
LW
XLP
LW vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LW | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | 0.12 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | 0.26 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.03 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 0.16 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 0.31 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LW | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 0.12 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 0.42 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.43 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
LW vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LW | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -35.90% | -28.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.37% | -9.69% | -31.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.56% | -12.39% | -52.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.56% | -16.30% | -48.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.34% | -8.58% | -52.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.19% | -7.06% | -14.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.25% | 4.90% | +18.35% |
Volatility
LW vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a higher volatility of 10.58% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 3.99%. This indicates that LW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LW | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.58% | 3.99% | +6.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.23% | 9.86% | +28.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.16% | 12.66% | +31.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.84% | 13.30% | +24.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.88% | 14.73% | +21.15% |
Dividends
LW vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than XLP's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.60% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.66% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LW and XLP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LW has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to XLP (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LW dropped -64.56% vs XLP's -35.90%.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LW and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer