LW vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LW or GIS.
Key characteristics
| LW | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -24.22% | 2.23% |
| 1Y Return | -14.78% | 2.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 14.16% | 3.76% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.26% | 7.57% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.30 | 0.11 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.08 | 0.27 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.98 | 1.03 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.24 | 0.07 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.50 | 0.38 |
| Ulcer Index | 25.68% | 5.23% |
| Daily Std Dev | 43.65% | 18.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.32% | -45.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -28.43% | -25.23% |
Fundamentals
| LW | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.58B | $35.59B |
| EPS | $4.26 | $4.20 |
| PE Ratio | 19.06 | 15.26 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.53 | 3.34 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $6.46B | $19.80B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.65B | $6.78B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.30B | $4.19B |
Correlation
The correlation between LW and GIS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LW vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a -24.22% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's 2.23% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LW vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LW vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than GIS's 3.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 1.79% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.70% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
LW vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LW vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 4.79%. This indicates that LW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LW vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities