PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LW vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LW and GIS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

LW vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-22.39%
-4.78%
LW
GIS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LW:

-0.87

GIS:

-0.17

Sortino Ratio

LW:

-0.97

GIS:

-0.11

Omega Ratio

LW:

0.81

GIS:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

LW:

-0.81

GIS:

-0.11

Martin Ratio

LW:

-1.48

GIS:

-0.44

Ulcer Index

LW:

29.08%

GIS:

7.45%

Daily Std Dev

LW:

49.67%

GIS:

18.96%

Max Drawdown

LW:

-53.32%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

LW:

-46.75%

GIS:

-30.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LW:

$8.53B

GIS:

$32.40B

EPS

LW:

$2.54

GIS:

$4.60

PE Ratio

LW:

23.55

GIS:

12.78

PEG Ratio

LW:

3.69

GIS:

3.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

LW:

$6.33B

GIS:

$19.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LW:

$1.45B

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

LW:

$871.20M

GIS:

$4.08B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a -10.49% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's -6.87% return.


LW

YTD

-10.49%

1M

-24.54%

6M

-22.39%

1Y

-43.12%

5Y*

-6.77%

10Y*

N/A

GIS

YTD

-6.87%

1M

-10.95%

6M

-4.79%

1Y

-3.80%

5Y*

5.22%

10Y*

4.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LW vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LW is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LW is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LW is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LW is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LW is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LW is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LW vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.87, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.87-0.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.97-0.11
The chart of Omega ratio for LW, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.810.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.81-0.11
The chart of Martin ratio for LW, currently valued at -1.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-1.48-0.44
LW
GIS

The current LW Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LW and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.87
-0.17
LW
GIS

Dividends

LW vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than GIS's 4.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
2.41%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.07%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

LW vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-46.75%
-30.90%
LW
GIS

Volatility

LW vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a higher volatility of 25.68% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.47%. This indicates that LW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
25.68%
6.47%
LW
GIS

Financials

LW vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab