LW vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LW or GIS.
Correlation
The correlation between LW and GIS is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LW vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LW:
-0.75
GIS:
-0.84
LW:
-0.81
GIS:
-1.04
LW:
0.85
GIS:
0.88
LW:
-0.67
GIS:
-0.50
LW:
-1.39
GIS:
-1.33
LW:
27.07%
GIS:
13.38%
LW:
49.31%
GIS:
21.71%
LW:
-56.43%
GIS:
-45.08%
LW:
-53.59%
GIS:
-35.01%
Fundamentals
LW:
$7.27B
GIS:
$31.07B
LW:
$2.55
GIS:
$4.55
LW:
20.20
GIS:
12.47
LW:
2.01
GIS:
3.61
LW:
1.14
GIS:
1.53
LW:
4.45
GIS:
3.28
LW:
$6.39B
GIS:
$19.64B
LW:
$1.44B
GIS:
$6.95B
LW:
$1.09B
GIS:
$3.99B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a -21.98% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's -12.41% return.
LW
-21.98%
-1.24%
-35.07%
-36.62%
-2.02%
N/A
GIS
-12.41%
-2.50%
-13.99%
-18.21%
1.55%
3.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LW vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LW
GIS
LW vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LW vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than GIS's 4.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 2.84% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 4.39% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
LW vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LW vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.20%. This indicates that LW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LW vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LW vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 422.50M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 248.70M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 146.00M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.