PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LUX vs. EL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LUX and EL is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

LUX vs. EL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema ETF Trust - Tema Luxury ETF (LUX) and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.67%
-25.98%
LUX
EL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LUX:

-0.17

EL:

-1.05

Sortino Ratio

LUX:

-0.13

EL:

-1.52

Omega Ratio

LUX:

0.99

EL:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

LUX:

-0.15

EL:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

LUX:

-0.24

EL:

-1.31

Ulcer Index

LUX:

10.79%

EL:

34.75%

Daily Std Dev

LUX:

15.77%

EL:

43.52%

Max Drawdown

LUX:

-18.56%

EL:

-82.39%

Current Drawdown

LUX:

-14.70%

EL:

-79.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than EL's -1.48% return.


LUX

YTD

-0.73%

1M

-3.84%

6M

-4.67%

1Y

-1.87%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EL

YTD

-1.48%

1M

-7.71%

6M

-25.97%

1Y

-43.99%

5Y*

-18.53%

10Y*

1.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LUX vs. EL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LUX is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LUX is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LUX is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LUX is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LUX is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LUX is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

EL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EL is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EL is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EL is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EL is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EL is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EL is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LUX vs. EL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema ETF Trust - Tema Luxury ETF (LUX) and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LUX, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.17-1.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for LUX, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.13-1.52
The chart of Omega ratio for LUX, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.990.80
The chart of Calmar ratio for LUX, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.15-0.66
The chart of Martin ratio for LUX, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.24-1.31
LUX
EL

The current LUX Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the EL Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUX and EL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.17
-1.05
LUX
EL

Dividends

LUX vs. EL - Dividend Comparison

LUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than EL's 3.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LUX
Tema ETF Trust - Tema Luxury ETF
2.85%2.83%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EL
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
3.15%3.11%1.81%0.99%0.59%0.56%0.86%1.21%1.10%1.62%1.16%1.10%

Drawdowns

LUX vs. EL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUX drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, smaller than the maximum EL drawdown of -82.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUX and EL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-14.70%
-62.63%
LUX
EL

Volatility

LUX vs. EL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema ETF Trust - Tema Luxury ETF (LUX) is 4.38%, while The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that LUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.38%
6.53%
LUX
EL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab