PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LUV vs. O
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LUVO
YTD Return14.26%2.30%
1Y Return33.12%12.98%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.64%-2.87%
5Y Return (Ann)-10.00%-1.07%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.87%7.08%
Sharpe Ratio0.970.78
Sortino Ratio1.411.18
Omega Ratio1.201.14
Calmar Ratio0.590.53
Martin Ratio2.361.97
Ulcer Index15.49%6.94%
Daily Std Dev37.60%17.67%
Max Drawdown-78.23%-48.45%
Current Drawdown-47.36%-15.49%

Fundamentals


LUVO
Market Cap$19.21B$49.90B
EPS-$0.08$1.05
PEG Ratio0.485.79
Total Revenue (TTM)$27.38B$5.01B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$1.70B$4.83B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.68B$3.74B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LUV and O is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LUV vs. O - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LUV achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than O's 2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, LUV has underperformed O with an annualized return of -0.87%, while O has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.82%
4.53%
LUV
O

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LUV vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LUV, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LUV, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LUV, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LUV, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LUV, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.36
O
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for O, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.78
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for O, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for O, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for O, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for O, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.97

LUV vs. O - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUV Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the O Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUV and O, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.97
0.78
LUV
O

Dividends

LUV vs. O - Dividend Comparison

LUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than O's 5.56% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
2.22%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.30%1.30%0.73%0.75%0.66%0.52%0.69%
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.56%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.50%3.69%4.18%4.45%4.18%4.41%4.59%5.83%

Drawdowns

LUV vs. O - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUV drawdown since its inception was -78.23%, which is greater than O's maximum drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUV and O. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-47.36%
-15.49%
LUV
O

Volatility

LUV vs. O - Volatility Comparison

Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) has a higher volatility of 10.73% compared to Realty Income Corporation (O) at 5.96%. This indicates that LUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.73%
5.96%
LUV
O

Financials

LUV vs. O - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Southwest Airlines Co. and Realty Income Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items