PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNG vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUNG vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNG achieves a -30.77% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.11% return.


LUNG

1D
-5.56%
1M
18.60%
YTD
-30.77%
6M
-23.88%
1Y
-48.48%
3Y*
-50.68%
5Y*
-48.59%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-6.20%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.58%
1Y
46.72%
3Y*
74.54%
5Y*
63.58%
10Y*
68.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNG vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LUNG
Pulmonx Corporation
-30.77%-67.45%-46.75%51.25%-73.71%-53.54%75.58%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.11%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%-4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNG and NVDA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020

0.25

The correlation between LUNG and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUNG:

$64.10M

NVDA:

$5.00T

EPS

LUNG:

-$1.29

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

LUNG:

0.71

NVDA:

19.79

PB Ratio

LUNG:

1.40

NVDA:

25.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUNG:

$88.55M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUNG:

$66.84M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUNG:

-$49.54M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNG vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNG
LUNG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LUNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNG vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUNGNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.23

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

2.32

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

5.67

-6.59

LUNG vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNG and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUNGNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

1.35

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.61

1.23

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

0.62

-1.18

Drawdowns

LUNG vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNG drawdown since its inception was -98.30%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNG and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNGNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.30%

-89.72%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.05%

-20.21%

-48.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.01%

-36.88%

-55.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.43%

-66.34%

-31.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.78%

-12.90%

-84.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.78%

-36.20%

-37.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.48%

8.27%

+44.21%

Volatility

LUNG vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG) has a higher volatility of 21.81% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 13.15%. This indicates that LUNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNGNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.81%

13.15%

+8.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.81%

26.39%

+29.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.45%

34.76%

+62.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.48%

51.73%

+27.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.92%

49.84%

+28.08%

Dividends

LUNG vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

LUNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUNG
Pulmonx Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

LUNG vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pulmonx Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
20.59M
81.62B
(LUNG) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LUNG vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pulmonx Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
77.9%
74.9%
Portfolio components
LUNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pulmonx Corporation reported a gross profit of 16.04M and revenue of 20.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

LUNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pulmonx Corporation reported an operating income of -12.96M and revenue of 20.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -62.9%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

LUNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pulmonx Corporation reported a net income of -13.65M and revenue of 20.59M, resulting in a net margin of -66.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUNG and NVDA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNG has higher volatility (21.81%) compared to NVDA (13.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNG dropped -98.30% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNG and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer