PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LUMN vs. T
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LUMNT
YTD Return282.51%39.97%
1Y Return525.00%47.90%
3Y Return (Ann)-17.85%2.40%
5Y Return (Ann)-8.04%-5.51%
10Y Return (Ann)-9.66%0.44%
Sharpe Ratio4.602.59
Sortino Ratio5.083.59
Omega Ratio1.641.45
Calmar Ratio6.451.00
Martin Ratio27.2414.95
Ulcer Index22.55%3.39%
Daily Std Dev133.54%19.59%
Max Drawdown-95.26%-65.25%
Current Drawdown-66.13%-25.47%

Fundamentals


LUMNT
Market Cap$7.12B$158.72B
EPS-$2.10$1.23
PEG Ratio54.581.95
Total Revenue (TTM)$10.08B$122.06B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.79B$62.96B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.57B$41.37B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LUMN and T is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LUMN vs. T - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LUMN achieves a 282.51% return, which is significantly higher than T's 39.97% return. Over the past 10 years, LUMN has underperformed T with an annualized return of -9.66%, while T has yielded a comparatively higher 0.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
430.31%
33.84%
LUMN
T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LUMN vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUMN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LUMN, currently valued at 4.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LUMN, currently valued at 5.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.005.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LUMN, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.64
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LUMN, currently valued at 6.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.45
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LUMN, currently valued at 27.24, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0027.24
T
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for T, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for T, currently valued at 3.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for T, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for T, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for T, currently valued at 14.95, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.95

LUMN vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUMN Sharpe Ratio is 4.60, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUMN and T, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.60
2.59
LUMN
T

Dividends

LUMN vs. T - Dividend Comparison

LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%14.37%7.97%10.26%7.57%14.26%12.95%9.08%8.59%5.46%6.78%
T
AT&T Inc.
5.02%6.62%6.66%6.39%5.46%3.94%5.29%3.81%3.41%4.13%4.14%3.87%

Drawdowns

LUMN vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUMN drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -65.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUMN and T. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-66.13%
-25.47%
LUMN
T

Volatility

LUMN vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) has a higher volatility of 19.44% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 6.92%. This indicates that LUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.44%
6.92%
LUMN
T

Financials

LUMN vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items