PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUMN vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUMN vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUMN achieves a -17.89% return, which is significantly lower than T's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LUMN has underperformed T with an annualized return of -9.37%, while T has yielded a comparatively higher 2.52% annualized return.


LUMN

1D
-2.74%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-27.66%
YTD
-17.89%
1Y
71.97%
3Y*
46.48%
5Y*
-10.65%
10Y*
-9.37%
ALL TIME*
6.43%

T

1D
0.17%
1M
14.48%
6M
-9.17%
YTD
-3.04%
1Y
-12.27%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
2.52%
ALL TIME*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$70.00M$71.60M$116.26M
$2.13B$1.85B$1.42B

LUMN vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
-17.89%46.33%190.16%-64.94%-55.48%38.82%-19.18%-5.22%2.00%-21.73%
T
AT&T Inc.
-3.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LUMN and T is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.35

The correlation between LUMN and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUMN:

$6.57B

T:

$159.44B

EPS

LUMN:

-$1.74

T:

$3.03

PS Ratio

LUMN:

0.52

T:

1.29

PB Ratio

LUMN:

0.55

T:

1.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUMN:

$12.12B

T:

$127.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUMN:

$1.52B

T:

$112.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUMN:

$1.12B

T:

$49.53B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUMN vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LUMN
LUMN Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LUMN vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUMNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.94

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

-0.39

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

-0.84

+2.35

LUMN vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUMN and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUMN vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUMN drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUMN and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUMNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.26%

-64.15%

-31.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.68%

-28.89%

-18.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.66%

-28.89%

-40.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.51%

-32.01%

-60.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.44%

-42.35%

-52.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.13%

-18.19%

-50.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.79%

-15.74%

-12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.96%

13.37%

+15.59%

Volatility

LUMN vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) has a higher volatility of 15.66% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.75%. This indicates that LUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUMNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.66%

8.75%

+6.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.04%

20.28%

+35.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.06%

24.78%

+56.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.67%

24.61%

+61.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.82%

24.02%

+43.80%

Dividends

LUMN vs. T - Dividend Comparison

LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.37%7.97%10.26%7.57%14.26%12.95%9.08%8.59%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.77%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

LUMN vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LUMN vs. T - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and AT&T Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LUMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

T - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AT&T Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.25B and revenue of 31.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.0%.

LUMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 602.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

T - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AT&T Inc. reported an operating income of 7.04B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

LUMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -200.00M and revenue of 2.90B, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.

T - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AT&T Inc. reported a net income of 4.59B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUMN and T have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUMN has higher volatility (15.66%) compared to T (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUMN dropped -95.26% vs T's -64.15%.

LUMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUMN and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer