LUMN vs. FAT

In the year-to-date period, LUMN achieves a -36.91% return, which is significantly lower than FAT's -9.58% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LUMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUMN and FAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%.

The maximum LUMN drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than FAT's maximum drawdown of -78.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUMN and FAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) has a higher volatility of 26.52% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 22.06%. This indicates that LUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.