PortfoliosLab logo
LUMN vs. FAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LUMN and FAT is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LUMN vs. FAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LUMN:

1.62

FAT:

-0.22

Sortino Ratio

LUMN:

3.29

FAT:

-0.01

Omega Ratio

LUMN:

1.41

FAT:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

LUMN:

2.19

FAT:

-0.21

Martin Ratio

LUMN:

5.62

FAT:

-0.76

Ulcer Index

LUMN:

37.09%

FAT:

16.94%

Daily Std Dev

LUMN:

133.27%

FAT:

52.44%

Max Drawdown

LUMN:

-95.26%

FAT:

-81.65%

Current Drawdown

LUMN:

-80.16%

FAT:

-56.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUMN:

$4.42B

FAT:

$45.64M

EPS

LUMN:

-$0.31

FAT:

-$11.96

PS Ratio

LUMN:

0.34

FAT:

0.08

PB Ratio

LUMN:

15.30

FAT:

12.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUMN:

$13.00B

FAT:

$142.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUMN:

$5.52B

FAT:

$46.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUMN:

$3.77B

FAT:

-$68.82B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUMN achieves a -22.79% return, which is significantly lower than FAT's -13.97% return.


LUMN

YTD

-22.79%

1M

25.00%

6M

-51.99%

1Y

212.98%

5Y*

-11.36%

10Y*

-13.42%

FAT

YTD

-13.97%

1M

4.94%

6M

-13.48%

1Y

-11.42%

5Y*

37.10%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LUMN vs. FAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LUMN is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LUMN is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LUMN is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAT is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAT is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAT is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAT is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAT is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAT is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LUMN vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LUMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUMN and FAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LUMN vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison

LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%14.37%7.97%10.26%7.57%14.26%12.95%9.08%8.59%5.46%
FAT
FAT Brands Inc.
6.12%10.53%9.24%10.92%4.91%0.00%6.37%18.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LUMN vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUMN drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than FAT's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUMN and FAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LUMN vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) have volatilities of 18.41% and 18.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LUMN vs. FAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20212022202320242025
3.18B
142.02B
(LUMN) Total Revenue
(FAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LUMN vs. FAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and FAT Brands Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
47.0%
32.3%
(LUMN) Gross Margin
(FAT) Gross Margin
LUMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.

FAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.92B and revenue of 142.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.3%.

LUMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

FAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -8.57B and revenue of 142.02B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.

LUMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lumen Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -201.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.

FAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -45.97B and revenue of 142.02B, resulting in a net margin of -32.4%.