LUMN vs. FAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LUMN or FAT.
Key characteristics
| LUMN | FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 282.51% | -6.46% |
| 1Y Return | 525.00% | -9.73% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -17.85% | -16.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -8.04% | 27.83% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.60 | -0.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.08 | 0.24 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.64 | 1.04 |
| Calmar Ratio | 6.45 | -0.07 |
| Martin Ratio | 27.24 | -0.14 |
| Ulcer Index | 22.55% | 30.63% |
| Daily Std Dev | 133.54% | 50.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.26% | -81.65% |
| Current Drawdown | -66.13% | -50.38% |
Fundamentals
| LUMN | FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.12B | $89.47M |
| EPS | -$2.10 | -$8.07 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $10.08B | $462.64M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.79B | $128.00M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.57B | $27.44M |
Correlation
The correlation between LUMN and FAT is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LUMN vs. FAT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LUMN achieves a 282.51% return, which is significantly higher than FAT's -6.46% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LUMN vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LUMN vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison
LUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.57%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.37% | 7.97% | 10.26% | 7.57% | 14.26% | 12.95% | 9.08% | 8.59% | 5.46% | 6.78% |
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | 10.57% | 9.24% | 10.92% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 6.37% | 18.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LUMN vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUMN drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than FAT's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUMN and FAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LUMN vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison
Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) has a higher volatility of 19.44% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 7.94%. This indicates that LUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LUMN vs. FAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lumen Technologies, Inc. and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities