Correlation
The correlation between LULU and ROST is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
LULU vs. ROST
Compare and contrast key facts about Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LULU or ROST.
Performance
LULU vs. ROST - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
LULU:
0.08
ROST:
0.19
LULU:
0.19
ROST:
0.46
LULU:
1.03
ROST:
1.06
LULU:
-0.07
ROST:
0.23
LULU:
-0.21
ROST:
0.59
LULU:
18.24%
ROST:
8.18%
LULU:
43.96%
ROST:
26.94%
LULU:
-92.26%
ROST:
-82.24%
LULU:
-39.22%
ROST:
-11.86%
Fundamentals
LULU:
$37.34B
ROST:
$45.14B
LULU:
$14.64
ROST:
$6.33
LULU:
21.23
ROST:
21.68
LULU:
1.28
ROST:
2.58
LULU:
3.53
ROST:
2.12
LULU:
9.00
ROST:
8.09
LULU:
$8.38B
ROST:
$16.27B
LULU:
$5.00B
ROST:
$4.50B
LULU:
$2.31B
ROST:
$2.43B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -18.74% return, which is significantly lower than ROST's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has outperformed ROST with an annualized return of 17.82%, while ROST has yielded a comparatively lower 12.22% annualized return.
LULU
-18.74%
16.00%
-2.00%
2.56%
6.47%
2.35%
17.82%
ROST
-8.97%
-1.75%
-5.52%
-2.40%
22.34%
8.93%
12.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LULU vs. ROST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LULU
ROST
LULU vs. ROST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
LULU vs. ROST - Dividend Comparison
LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 1.10% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 0.23% | 0.88% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
LULU vs. ROST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, which is greater than ROST's maximum drawdown of -82.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and ROST.
Loading data...
Volatility
LULU vs. ROST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) is 11.30%, while Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that LULU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
LULU vs. ROST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Ross Stores, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LULU vs. ROST - Profitability Comparison
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.
ROST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ross Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.57B and revenue of 5.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.
ROST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ross Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 731.02M and revenue of 5.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 748.40M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
ROST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ross Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 586.78M and revenue of 5.91B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.