LULU vs. ROST

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -26.94% return, which is significantly lower than ROST's 8.58% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has outperformed ROST with an annualized return of 21.39%, while ROST has yielded a comparatively lower 13.43% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the ROST Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and ROST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, which is greater than ROST's maximum drawdown of -82.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and ROST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) at 7.21%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Ross Stores, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.