LULU vs. ROST
Compare and contrast key facts about Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LULU or ROST.
Correlation
The correlation between LULU and ROST is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LULU vs. ROST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LULU:
-0.55
ROST:
0.48
LULU:
-0.57
ROST:
0.89
LULU:
0.92
ROST:
1.10
LULU:
-0.40
ROST:
0.68
LULU:
-0.65
ROST:
1.69
LULU:
32.87%
ROST:
6.03%
LULU:
39.48%
ROST:
21.25%
LULU:
-92.24%
ROST:
-82.23%
LULU:
-26.33%
ROST:
-4.63%
Fundamentals
LULU:
$45.87B
ROST:
$49.16B
LULU:
$13.82
ROST:
$6.35
LULU:
27.25
ROST:
23.47
LULU:
1.56
ROST:
1.94
LULU:
$10.18B
ROST:
$42.48B
LULU:
$5.99B
ROST:
$11.89B
LULU:
$2.71B
ROST:
$6.18B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LULU having a -1.50% return and ROST slightly higher at -1.49%. Over the past 10 years, LULU has outperformed ROST with an annualized return of 19.63%, while ROST has yielded a comparatively lower 13.49% annualized return.
LULU
-1.50%
-3.36%
28.69%
-19.98%
9.36%
19.63%
ROST
-1.49%
-0.61%
1.44%
9.78%
5.87%
13.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LULU vs. ROST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LULU
ROST
LULU vs. ROST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LULU vs. ROST - Dividend Comparison
LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 0.99% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 0.23% | 0.88% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
LULU vs. ROST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, which is greater than ROST's maximum drawdown of -82.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and ROST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LULU vs. ROST - Volatility Comparison
Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 8.91% compared to Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) at 5.92%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LULU vs. ROST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Ross Stores, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities