LULU vs. MNST

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -29.94% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 11.62% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 15.31%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 9.75% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LULU nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 24.14% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 9.27%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.