PortfoliosLab logo
LULU vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LULU and MNST is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

LULU vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
841.79%
1,569.40%
LULU
MNST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LULU:

-0.71

MNST:

0.08

Sortino Ratio

LULU:

-0.86

MNST:

0.27

Omega Ratio

LULU:

0.89

MNST:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

LULU:

-0.54

MNST:

0.08

Martin Ratio

LULU:

-1.57

MNST:

0.23

Ulcer Index

LULU:

18.82%

MNST:

8.92%

Daily Std Dev

LULU:

41.35%

MNST:

24.56%

Max Drawdown

LULU:

-92.24%

MNST:

-69.17%

Current Drawdown

LULU:

-48.42%

MNST:

-6.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LULU:

$31.81B

MNST:

$55.55B

EPS

LULU:

$14.65

MNST:

$1.49

PE Ratio

LULU:

18.00

MNST:

38.31

PEG Ratio

LULU:

1.05

MNST:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

LULU:

$10.59B

MNST:

$5.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LULU:

$6.27B

MNST:

$3.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

LULU:

$2.84B

MNST:

$1.46B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -31.04% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's 8.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 14.82%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.


LULU

YTD

-31.04%

1M

-24.56%

6M

-2.47%

1Y

-26.25%

5Y*

7.81%

10Y*

14.82%

MNST

YTD

8.60%

1M

3.13%

6M

12.03%

1Y

2.39%

5Y*

16.10%

10Y*

9.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LULU vs. MNST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LULU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LULU is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LULU is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LULU is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LULU is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LULU is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LULU is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MNST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNST is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNST is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNST is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNST is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNST is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNST is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LULU vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.71, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
LULU: -0.71
MNST: 0.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.86, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LULU: -0.86
MNST: 0.27
The chart of Omega ratio for LULU, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LULU: 0.89
MNST: 1.04
The chart of Calmar ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
LULU: -0.54
MNST: 0.08
The chart of Martin ratio for LULU, currently valued at -1.57, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
LULU: -1.57
MNST: 0.23

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.71
0.08
LULU
MNST

Dividends

LULU vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

Neither LULU nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LULU vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-48.42%
-6.20%
LULU
MNST

Volatility

LULU vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 20.72% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 6.46%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.72%
6.46%
LULU
MNST

Financials

LULU vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items