PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LULU vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LULU vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.06%
-0.89%
LULU
MNST

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -38.63% return, which is significantly lower than MNST's -7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 21.25%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.


LULU

YTD

-38.63%

1M

7.60%

6M

-6.32%

1Y

-25.72%

5Y (annualized)

7.69%

10Y (annualized)

21.25%

MNST

YTD

-7.82%

1M

-1.75%

6M

-1.86%

1Y

-3.08%

5Y (annualized)

12.68%

10Y (annualized)

11.23%

Fundamentals


LULUMNST
Market Cap$39.40B$54.48B
EPS$12.93$1.56
PE Ratio24.8235.91
PEG Ratio1.561.67
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.79B$8.29B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.59B$3.98B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.28B$2.00B

Key characteristics


LULUMNST
Sharpe Ratio-0.71-0.16
Sortino Ratio-0.82-0.05
Omega Ratio0.890.99
Calmar Ratio-0.47-0.14
Martin Ratio-0.74-0.28
Ulcer Index34.19%12.83%
Daily Std Dev35.51%23.39%
Max Drawdown-92.24%-69.17%
Current Drawdown-38.63%-12.73%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between LULU and MNST is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LULU vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.71-0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.82-0.05
The chart of Omega ratio for LULU, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.890.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.47-0.14
The chart of Martin ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.74-0.28
LULU
MNST

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.71
-0.16
LULU
MNST

Dividends

LULU vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

Neither LULU nor MNST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LULU vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-38.63%
-12.73%
LULU
MNST

Volatility

LULU vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 9.35%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.99%
9.35%
LULU
MNST

Financials

LULU vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items