LUG.TO vs. NEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LUG.TO or NEM.
Key characteristics
| LUG.TO | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 88.39% | 1.49% |
| 1Y Return | 102.18% | 17.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 39.06% | -7.87% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 34.96% | 5.11% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 21.33% | 10.45% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.87 | 0.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.32 | 1.08 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.42 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.79 | 0.39 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.20 | 2.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.27% | 11.63% |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.12% | 37.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.92% | -77.75% |
| Current Drawdown | -13.10% | -47.11% |
Fundamentals
| LUG.TO | NEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$7.40B | $48.19B |
| EPS | CA$1.76 | -$2.15 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$718.86M | $16.84B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$363.05M | $3.84B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$389.06M | $6.78B |
Correlation
The correlation between LUG.TO and NEM is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LUG.TO vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a 88.39% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 21.33%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LUG.TO vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LUG.TO vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than NEM's 2.79% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 2.23% | 3.27% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 2.79% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 1.19% | 5.32% |
Drawdowns
LUG.TO vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LUG.TO vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) is 11.86%, while Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that LUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LUG.TO vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities