LUG.TO vs. GATO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Gatos Silver, Inc. (GATO.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LUG.TO or GATO.TO.
Key characteristics
| LUG.TO | GATO.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 88.39% | 151.22% |
| 1Y Return | 102.18% | 202.94% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 39.06% | 7.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.87 | 3.50 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.32 | 3.87 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.42 | 1.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.79 | 3.13 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.20 | 23.67 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.27% | 9.31% |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.12% | 62.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.92% | -87.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -13.10% | -22.33% |
Fundamentals
| LUG.TO | GATO.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$7.40B | CA$1.53B |
| EPS | CA$1.76 | CA$0.54 |
| PE Ratio | 17.31 | 40.91 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$718.86M | CA$0.00 |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$363.05M | -CA$12.00K |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$389.06M | CA$44.78M |
Correlation
The correlation between LUG.TO and GATO.TO is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LUG.TO vs. GATO.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a 88.39% return, which is significantly lower than GATO.TO's 151.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LUG.TO vs. GATO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Gatos Silver, Inc. (GATO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LUG.TO vs. GATO.TO - Dividend Comparison
LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while GATO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 2.23% | 3.27% | 1.97% |
GATO.TO Gatos Silver, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LUG.TO vs. GATO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than GATO.TO's maximum drawdown of -87.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and GATO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LUG.TO vs. GATO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) is 11.86%, while Gatos Silver, Inc. (GATO.TO) has a volatility of 22.17%. This indicates that LUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GATO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LUG.TO vs. GATO.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Gatos Silver, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities