PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LUG.TO vs. ^TNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LUG.TO^TNX
YTD Return85.29%14.28%
1Y Return101.84%-2.58%
3Y Return (Ann)38.86%39.81%
5Y Return (Ann)34.48%19.29%
10Y Return (Ann)22.04%6.58%
Sharpe Ratio2.66-0.02
Sortino Ratio3.160.14
Omega Ratio1.401.01
Calmar Ratio1.66-0.01
Martin Ratio18.52-0.05
Ulcer Index5.34%11.32%
Daily Std Dev37.13%23.12%
Max Drawdown-97.92%-93.78%
Current Drawdown-14.53%-44.93%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

The correlation between LUG.TO and ^TNX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

LUG.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a 85.29% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO has outperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 22.04%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.58% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
47.79%
0.93%
LUG.TO
^TNX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LUG.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUG.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LUG.TO, currently valued at 2.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LUG.TO, currently valued at 2.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LUG.TO, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LUG.TO, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LUG.TO, currently valued at 16.36, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.36
^TNX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.00

LUG.TO vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUG.TO and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.51
0
LUG.TO
^TNX

Drawdowns

LUG.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, roughly equal to the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and ^TNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-40.91%
-44.93%
LUG.TO
^TNX

Volatility

LUG.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.97% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 6.38%. This indicates that LUG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.97%
6.38%
LUG.TO
^TNX