PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LU vs. ENSV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LUENSV
YTD Return69.60%-76.19%
1Y Return30.30%-82.36%
3Y Return (Ann)-40.02%-64.04%
Sharpe Ratio0.64-0.75
Sortino Ratio1.67-1.33
Omega Ratio1.200.82
Calmar Ratio0.60-0.83
Martin Ratio2.57-1.80
Ulcer Index22.49%46.07%
Daily Std Dev90.79%110.06%
Max Drawdown-96.68%-99.96%
Current Drawdown-91.97%-99.96%

Fundamentals


LUENSV
Market Cap$2.33B$3.01M
EPS-$0.76-$0.28
Total Revenue (TTM)$20.24B$20.04M
Gross Profit (TTM)$10.84B$2.83M
EBITDA (TTM)-$1.27B$1.84M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between LU and ENSV is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LU vs. ENSV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LU achieves a 69.60% return, which is significantly higher than ENSV's -76.19% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.48%
-76.98%
LU
ENSV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LU vs. ENSV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Enservco Corporation (ENSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LU, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LU, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LU, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LU, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LU, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.57
ENSV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ENSV, currently valued at -0.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.75
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ENSV, currently valued at -1.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ENSV, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.82
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ENSV, currently valued at -0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ENSV, currently valued at -1.79, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.80

LU vs. ENSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LU Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the ENSV Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LU and ENSV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
-0.75
LU
ENSV

Dividends

LU vs. ENSV - Dividend Comparison

LU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.86%, while ENSV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd
103.86%11.60%26.29%
ENSV
Enservco Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LU vs. ENSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LU drawdown since its inception was -96.68%, roughly equal to the maximum ENSV drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LU and ENSV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-98.00%-96.00%-94.00%-92.00%-90.00%-88.00%-86.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-91.97%
-98.61%
LU
ENSV

Volatility

LU vs. ENSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) is 16.14%, while Enservco Corporation (ENSV) has a volatility of 74.08%. This indicates that LU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.14%
74.08%
LU
ENSV

Financials

LU vs. ENSV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lufax Holding Ltd and Enservco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items