PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTPZ vs. USHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTPZ vs. USHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than USHY's 1.42% return.


LTPZ

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.02%
YTD
0.41%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
-0.79%
5Y*
-5.24%
10Y*
0.75%

USHY

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.77%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTPZ vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF
0.41%4.00%-4.80%0.96%-31.71%7.02%24.89%17.47%-7.22%6.64%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.42%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-2.41%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LTPZ and USHY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.24

Over the past year, LTPZ and USHY have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTPZ vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTPZ
LTPZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LTPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LTPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTPZ vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTPZUSHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

1.93

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

2.91

-2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.37

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.90

-2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.48

13.03

-11.55

LTPZ vs. USHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the USHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTPZ and USHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTPZUSHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

1.93

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.58

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.58

-0.37

Drawdowns

LTPZ vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than USHY's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and USHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTPZUSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.99%

-22.44%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-2.43%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-4.66%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

-15.56%

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.74%

-0.27%

-32.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-2.67%

-9.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

0.54%

+2.66%

Volatility

LTPZ vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that LTPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTPZUSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

1.13%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.41%

2.91%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

3.65%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

7.34%

+8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

8.25%

+6.82%

LTPZ vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTPZ vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison

LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than USHY's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTPZ
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF
5.23%4.64%3.71%3.71%8.38%3.56%1.42%1.74%3.05%2.25%2.32%0.71%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.92%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTPZ and USHY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTPZ has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to USHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTPZ dropped -40.99% vs USHY's -22.44%.

On 5-year performance, USHY leads with 4.24% vs -5.24% for LTPZ. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USHY has performed better with a 4.24% return vs -5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LTPZ.

USHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 5.23% for LTPZ.

LTPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while USHY is High Yield Bonds. LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y), while USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LTPZ and 0.15% for USHY.

USHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTPZ and USHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer