PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LTI.L vs. III.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LTI.L and III.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

LTI.L vs. III.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lindsell Train Investment Trust plc (LTI.L) and 3I Group plc (III.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.05%
23.16%
LTI.L
III.L

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LTI.L:

0.37

III.L:

3.15

Sortino Ratio

LTI.L:

0.69

III.L:

4.04

Omega Ratio

LTI.L:

1.08

III.L:

1.55

Calmar Ratio

LTI.L:

0.14

III.L:

8.46

Martin Ratio

LTI.L:

1.05

III.L:

26.27

Ulcer Index

LTI.L:

8.41%

III.L:

2.73%

Daily Std Dev

LTI.L:

23.61%

III.L:

22.72%

Max Drawdown

LTI.L:

-69.93%

III.L:

-88.39%

Current Drawdown

LTI.L:

-56.14%

III.L:

-0.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LTI.L:

£175.60M

III.L:

£39.69B

EPS

LTI.L:

£38.54

III.L:

£4.35

PE Ratio

LTI.L:

0.23

III.L:

9.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

LTI.L:

£9.35M

III.L:

£2.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LTI.L:

£8.42M

III.L:

£2.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

LTI.L:

£11.57M

III.L:

£2.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTI.L achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than III.L's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LTI.L has underperformed III.L with an annualized return of 7.69%, while III.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.02% annualized return.


LTI.L

YTD

9.63%

1M

3.66%

6M

9.90%

1Y

8.01%

5Y*

-4.07%

10Y*

7.69%

III.L

YTD

15.12%

1M

5.94%

6M

28.85%

1Y

71.33%

5Y*

32.50%

10Y*

27.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LTI.L vs. III.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTI.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LTI.L is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LTI.L is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LTI.L is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LTI.L is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LTI.L is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LTI.L is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

III.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of III.L is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of III.L is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of III.L is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of III.L is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of III.L is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of III.L is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LTI.L vs. III.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lindsell Train Investment Trust plc (LTI.L) and 3I Group plc (III.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LTI.L, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.343.00
The chart of Sortino ratio for LTI.L, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.663.80
The chart of Omega ratio for LTI.L, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.081.50
The chart of Calmar ratio for LTI.L, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.137.30
The chart of Martin ratio for LTI.L, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.0921.32
LTI.L
III.L

The current LTI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the III.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTI.L and III.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.34
3.00
LTI.L
III.L

Dividends

LTI.L vs. III.L - Dividend Comparison

LTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than III.L's 1.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LTI.L
Lindsell Train Investment Trust plc
5.87%6.44%5.96%5.01%3.93%3.03%0.13%1.80%1.88%0.98%1.26%1.80%
III.L
3I Group plc
1.58%1.82%2.32%3.76%2.78%3.02%3.42%2.97%2.03%1.90%1.68%1.80%

Drawdowns

LTI.L vs. III.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTI.L drawdown since its inception was -69.93%, smaller than the maximum III.L drawdown of -88.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTI.L and III.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-56.53%
-0.64%
LTI.L
III.L

Volatility

LTI.L vs. III.L - Volatility Comparison

Lindsell Train Investment Trust plc (LTI.L) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to 3I Group plc (III.L) at 4.39%. This indicates that LTI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than III.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.38%
4.39%
LTI.L
III.L

Financials

LTI.L vs. III.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lindsell Train Investment Trust plc and 3I Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LTI.L values in GBP, III.L values in GBp
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab