LTHM vs. LAC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LTHM (Livent Corporation) and LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — LTHM in Specialty Chemicals, LAC in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LTHM vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Livent Corporation (LTHM) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LTHM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LAC

• 1D: -3.49%
• 1M: -14.78%
• YTD: -4.82%
• 6M: -13.00%
• 1Y: 62.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTHM vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LTHM Livent Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	-8.18%	-2.34%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-4.82%	46.80%	-53.59%	-27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LTHM and LAC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.17

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) LTHM : $920.10M LAC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) LTHM : $539.80M LAC : -$580.22K
EBITDA (TTM) LTHM : $491.50M LAC : -$52.10M

Return for Risk

LTHM vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 66
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTHM vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Livent Corporation (LTHM) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTHM	LAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.47	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.09	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.47	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LTHM	LAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-81.83%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-63.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-64.59%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-63.12%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	42.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTHM	LAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	53.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	132.08%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	101.15%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	101.15%	—

Dividends

LTHM vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTHM nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTHM and LAC in my portfolio?

LTHM and LAC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.