PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Litecoin (LTC-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTC-USD achieves a -39.14% return, which is significantly lower than XLM-USD's 3.24% return. Over the past 10 years, LTC-USD has underperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 25.51%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 63.68% annualized return.


LTC-USD

1D
-0.44%
1M
-15.03%
YTD
-39.14%
6M
-45.59%
1Y
-47.85%
3Y*
-20.86%
5Y*
-23.53%
10Y*
25.51%

XLM-USD

1D
-6.81%
1M
31.58%
YTD
3.24%
6M
-19.68%
1Y
-24.06%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
-11.64%
10Y*
63.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTC-USD
Litecoin
-39.14%-25.56%41.56%3.88%-52.04%17.47%202.70%38.01%-86.89%5,110.32%
XLM-USD
Stellar
3.24%-39.55%157.40%81.66%-73.35%108.68%184.76%-60.36%-68.37%14,396.90%

Correlation

The correlation between LTC-USD and XLM-USD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2014

0.57

The correlation between LTC-USD and XLM-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTC-USD
LTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XLM-USD
XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Litecoin (LTC-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTC-USDXLM-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.75

-0.28

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.95

0.14

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.01

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.34

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-0.49

-0.71

LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTC-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTC-USD and XLM-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTC-USDXLM-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

-0.28

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

-0.13

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.47

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.34

-0.14

Drawdowns

LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTC-USD drawdown since its inception was -97.59%, roughly equal to the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTC-USD and XLM-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTC-USDXLM-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.59%

-96.21%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.33%

-71.19%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.94%

-74.37%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.45%

-83.25%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.64%

-96.21%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.97%

-76.50%

-11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.63%

-72.13%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.62%

49.44%

-3.82%

Volatility

LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Litecoin (LTC-USD) is 12.34%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 43.26%. This indicates that LTC-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTC-USDXLM-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.34%

43.26%

-30.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.87%

59.38%

-23.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.08%

70.60%

-17.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.70%

74.98%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.62%

112.83%

-27.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTC-USD and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.26%) compared to LTC-USD (12.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTC-USD dropped -97.59% vs XLM-USD's -96.21%.

XLM-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTC-USD and XLM-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer