LTC-USD vs. XLM-USD

In the year-to-date period, LTC-USD achieves a -16.89% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -20.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LTC-USD has underperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 48.25%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 55.46% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Litecoin (LTC-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LTC-USD Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTC-USD and XLM-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum LTC-USD drawdown since its inception was -97.41%, roughly equal to the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTC-USD and XLM-USD.

Litecoin (LTC-USD) has a higher volatility of 22.15% compared to Stellar (XLM-USD) at 19.47%. This indicates that LTC-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.