LSXMA vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LSXMA (The Liberty SiriusXM Group) is a stock, while FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity.

Performance

LSXMA vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Liberty SiriusXM Group (LSXMA) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LSXMA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 15.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSXMA vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LSXMA The Liberty SiriusXM Group	0.00%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	18.20%

Return for Risk

LSXMA vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSXMA vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Liberty SiriusXM Group (LSXMA) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSXMA	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.83	—

Drawdowns

LSXMA vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSXMA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSXMA and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSXMA	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-43.56%	+43.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.05%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-11.49%	+11.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LSXMA	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	18.55%	-18.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	25.79%	-25.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	25.72%	-25.72%

Dividends

LSXMA vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

LSXMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
LSXMA The Liberty SiriusXM Group	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%