LSGR vs. FTEC
LSGR (Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Natixis, while FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. LSGR is actively managed, while FTEC is passively managed. Over the past year, LSGR returned 12.43% vs 60.87% for FTEC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSGR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
LSGR vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGR achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 31.89% return.
LSGR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 31.89%
- 6M
- 30.74%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
LSGR vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF | -0.58% | 15.32% | 38.52% | 12.34% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 31.89% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 12.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGR and FTEC is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between LSGR and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
LSGR vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSGR
FTEC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
LSGR
FTEC
Communication Services
LSGR
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
LSGR
FTEC
Healthcare
LSGR
FTEC
-
Financial Services
LSGR
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
LSGR
FTEC
-
Industrials
LSGR
FTEC
Basic Materials
LSGR
-
FTEC
-
Energy
LSGR
-
FTEC
Real Estate
LSGR
-
FTEC
-
Utilities
LSGR
-
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSGR vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
LSGR
FTEC
LSGR vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSGR | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.48 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 3.76 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 12.10 | -9.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSGR | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 2.97 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.99 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
LSGR vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGR drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGR and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGR | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -34.95% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | -16.26% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -1.49% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -5.56% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 5.05% | +0.62% |
Volatility
LSGR vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is 4.72%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that LSGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSGR | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 6.43% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.36% | 16.14% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 20.63% | -4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 25.23% | -4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 24.69% | -4.30% |
LSGR vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSGR vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
LSGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.08% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSGR and FTEC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to LSGR (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGR dropped -22.92% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 1-year performance, FTEC leads with 60.87% vs 12.43% for LSGR. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, LSGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 60.87% return vs 12.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LSGR.
FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for LSGR.
LSGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LSGR and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSGR and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer