PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSCC vs. SYNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LSCC vs. SYNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 77.68% return, which is significantly higher than SYNA's 60.97% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has outperformed SYNA with an annualized return of 36.27%, while SYNA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.


LSCC

1D
-4.87%
1M
-9.54%
6M
57.33%
YTD
77.68%
1Y
143.37%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
36.27%

SYNA

1D
-6.00%
1M
-13.93%
6M
41.01%
YTD
60.97%
1Y
74.43%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
-4.83%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSCC vs. SYNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
77.68%29.89%-17.89%6.33%-15.81%68.18%139.39%176.59%19.72%-21.47%
SYNA
Synaptics Incorporated
60.97%-3.01%-33.10%19.88%-67.13%200.32%46.57%76.75%-6.84%-25.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LSCC and SYNA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2002

0.45

The correlation between LSCC and SYNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LSCC:

$17.91B

SYNA:

$4.65B

EPS

LSCC:

$0.14

SYNA:

-$1.23

PS Ratio

LSCC:

31.45

SYNA:

3.96

PB Ratio

LSCC:

24.62

SYNA:

3.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

LSCC:

$574.01M

SYNA:

$1.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LSCC:

$383.93M

SYNA:

$511.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

LSCC:

$65.23M

SYNA:

$52.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSCC vs. SYNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCC
LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SYNA
SYNA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SYNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYNA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SYNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYNA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCC vs. SYNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSCCSYNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.46

2.55

+4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.46

7.30

+13.16

LSCC vs. SYNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCC Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the SYNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCC and SYNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSCC vs. SYNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than SYNA's maximum drawdown of -85.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and SYNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSCCSYNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.34%

-85.34%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.33%

-29.31%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.09%

-64.18%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.09%

-85.34%

+24.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.09%

-85.34%

+24.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.80%

-59.31%

+43.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.02%

-38.27%

-16.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.04%

10.26%

-3.22%

Volatility

LSCC vs. SYNA - Volatility Comparison

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a higher volatility of 21.57% compared to Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) at 19.17%. This indicates that LSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSCCSYNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.57%

19.17%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.76%

47.33%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.59%

57.73%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.90%

54.05%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.87%

52.02%

-1.15%

Dividends

LSCC vs. SYNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSCC nor SYNA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LSCC vs. SYNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Synaptics Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
170.90M
294.20M
(LSCC) Total Revenue
(SYNA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LSCC vs. SYNA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Synaptics Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
68.8%
45.3%
Portfolio components
LSCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 117.63M and revenue of 170.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.

SYNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synaptics Incorporated reported a gross profit of 133.30M and revenue of 294.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.3%.

LSCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 26.07M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

SYNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synaptics Incorporated reported an operating income of -12.70M and revenue of 294.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.

LSCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 21.82M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

SYNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synaptics Incorporated reported a net income of -8.00M and revenue of 294.20M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LSCC and SYNA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSCC has higher volatility (21.57%) compared to SYNA (19.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCC dropped -97.34% vs SYNA's -85.34%.

LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSCC and SYNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer