PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LSCC vs. MC.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LSCCMC.PA
YTD Return1.26%5.55%
1Y Return-14.96%-11.23%
3Y Return (Ann)12.50%8.28%
5Y Return (Ann)36.48%17.97%
10Y Return (Ann)24.05%21.43%
Sharpe Ratio-0.34-0.43
Daily Std Dev48.61%27.31%
Max Drawdown-97.34%-70.25%
Current Drawdown-28.17%-12.80%

Fundamentals


LSCCMC.PA
Market Cap$10.16B€395.74B
EPS$1.85€30.34
PE Ratio39.9426.11
PEG Ratio3.182.58
Revenue (TTM)$737.15M€86.15B
Gross Profit (TTM)$452.05M€54.20B
EBITDA (TTM)$248.61M€25.27B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between LSCC and MC.PA is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LSCC vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than MC.PA's 5.55% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has outperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 24.05%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 21.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%8,000.00%9,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7,189.99%
6,807.46%
LSCC
MC.PA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lattice Semiconductor Corporation

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSCC vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSCC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LSCC, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.59
MC.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.44
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MC.PA, currently valued at -0.79, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.79

LSCC vs. MC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which roughly equals the MC.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LSCC and MC.PA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.60December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.28
-0.47
LSCC
MC.PA

Dividends

LSCC vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison

LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
1.69%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%3.58%2.26%

Drawdowns

LSCC vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and MC.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-28.17%
-16.45%
LSCC
MC.PA

Volatility

LSCC vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a higher volatility of 17.90% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 6.84%. This indicates that LSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
17.90%
6.84%
LSCC
MC.PA

Financials

LSCC vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. LSCC values in USD, MC.PA values in EUR