PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LSBDX vs. MUB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LSBDXMUB
YTD Return6.57%1.27%
1Y Return13.72%5.46%
3Y Return (Ann)0.20%-0.18%
5Y Return (Ann)1.57%1.16%
10Y Return (Ann)2.18%2.15%
Sharpe Ratio2.891.59
Sortino Ratio4.412.33
Omega Ratio1.591.31
Calmar Ratio1.220.93
Martin Ratio15.316.82
Ulcer Index0.99%0.93%
Daily Std Dev5.25%3.98%
Max Drawdown-30.57%-13.68%
Current Drawdown-1.42%-1.50%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between LSBDX and MUB is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LSBDX vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LSBDX achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 1.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LSBDX having a 2.18% annualized return and MUB not far behind at 2.15%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.82%
1.46%
LSBDX
MUB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LSBDX vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSBDX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio.


LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for LSBDX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%
Expense ratio chart for MUB: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSBDX vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSBDX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LSBDX, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LSBDX, currently valued at 4.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LSBDX, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.59
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LSBDX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LSBDX, currently valued at 15.31, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.31
MUB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MUB, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MUB, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MUB, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MUB, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MUB, currently valued at 6.82, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.82

LSBDX vs. MUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSBDX and MUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.89
1.59
LSBDX
MUB

Dividends

LSBDX vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than MUB's 2.96% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
5.38%5.09%5.15%2.89%3.28%3.70%3.44%3.72%2.12%3.52%4.33%5.02%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
2.96%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%2.73%3.02%

Drawdowns

LSBDX vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSBDX drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSBDX and MUB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.42%
-1.50%
LSBDX
MUB

Volatility

LSBDX vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) is 0.95%, while iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that LSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.95%
1.93%
LSBDX
MUB