LSBDX vs. MUB
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB).
LSBDX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 15, 1991. MUB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2007.
Performance
LSBDX vs. MUB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSBDX vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSBDX Loomis Sayles Bond Fund | -1.54% | 8.67% | 6.70% | 8.05% | -12.50% | 3.23% | 2.14% | 11.72% | -2.87% | 7.47% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | -0.37% | 3.78% | 1.26% | 5.56% | -7.34% | 1.02% | 5.12% | 7.06% | 0.93% | 4.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSBDX achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than MUB's -0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LSBDX has outperformed MUB with an annualized return of 3.45%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.96% annualized return.
LSBDX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -1.54%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.45%
MUB
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSBDX vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSBDX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSBDX vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank
LSBDX
MUB
LSBDX vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSBDX | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 0.96 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.25 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.21 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.27 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | 4.07 | +5.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSBDX | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 0.96 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.20 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.40 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.57 | +0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSBDX and MUB is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LSBDX vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison
LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than MUB's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSBDX Loomis Sayles Bond Fund | 3.90% | 4.15% | 5.51% | 5.09% | 5.13% | 2.88% | 3.83% | 3.97% | 3.78% | 5.86% | 3.13% | 7.37% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 2.93% | 3.14% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% |
Drawdowns
LSBDX vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSBDX drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSBDX and MUB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSBDX | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -13.68% | -16.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -3.30% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.60% | -11.88% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.60% | -13.68% | -2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -2.28% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -2.24% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 1.03% | -0.35% |
Volatility
LSBDX vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) is 1.42%, while iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a volatility of 1.53%. This indicates that LSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSBDX | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.53% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 2.03% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 4.14% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 4.04% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 4.91% | -0.02% |