LSAT vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
LSAT and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LSAT is an actively managed fund by Redwood. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Performance
LSAT vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSAT vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.40% | -1.54% | 18.16% | 13.64% | -12.99% | 25.10% | 20.47% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 12.79% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 14.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 12.79% return.
LSAT
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- 0.13%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSAT vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSAT vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
LSAT
SCHD
LSAT vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSAT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | 0.89 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.13 | 1.35 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.19 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 1.19 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 3.99 | -3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSAT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 0.89 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.59 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSAT and SCHD is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSAT vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than SCHD's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.87% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.85% | 0.36% | 3.44% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.44% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Drawdowns
LSAT vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and SCHD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSAT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -33.37% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -12.74% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | -16.85% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -2.89% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -3.34% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 3.89% | +0.33% |
Volatility
LSAT vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.40%. This indicates that LSAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSAT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.40% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 7.96% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 15.74% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 14.40% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 16.70% | +0.20% |