LRNZ vs. SMH

In the year-to-date period, LRNZ achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's -7.75% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LRNZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is comparable to the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRNZ and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -61.38%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) is 10.15%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that LRNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.