LRGF vs. IWL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL).

LRGF and IWL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. It was launched on Apr 30, 2015. IWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. Both LRGF and IWL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LRGF vs. IWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LRGF vs. IWL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	-4.69%	16.48%	26.59%	25.85%	-14.77%	25.01%	11.11%	26.11%	-9.66%	21.13%
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF	-5.75%	19.09%	27.12%	29.77%	-19.89%	27.79%	22.10%	31.42%	-3.30%	22.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly higher than IWL's -5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LRGF has underperformed IWL with an annualized return of 12.34%, while IWL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.77% annualized return.

LRGF

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -4.24%
• YTD: -4.69%
• 6M: -3.86%
• 1Y: 15.42%
• 3Y*: 18.34%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

IWL

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: -5.05%
• YTD: -5.75%
• 6M: -2.93%
• 1Y: 17.90%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 12.23%
• 10Y*: 14.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGF vs. IWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IWL's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

LRGF

iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF

IWL

iShares Russell Top 200 ETF

Return for Risk

LRGF vs. IWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF

LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 54
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 62

IWL

IWL Risk / Return Rank: 64
IWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
IWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IWL Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
IWL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGF vs. IWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGF	IWL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.97	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.49	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.22	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.57	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.87	6.89	-1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRGF vs. IWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the IWL Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGF and IWL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGF	IWL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.97	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.72	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.82	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.83	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and IWL is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LRGF vs. IWL - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than IWL's 0.96% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF	1.23%	1.16%	1.23%	1.49%	1.78%	1.05%	1.35%	1.76%	3.27%	1.68%	1.56%	0.83%
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF	0.96%	0.90%	1.04%	1.30%	1.54%	1.12%	1.30%	1.96%	1.93%	1.69%	1.96%	2.14%

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. IWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than IWL's maximum drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and IWL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGF	IWL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-32.71%	-3.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.37%	-11.81%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.62%	-25.65%	+4.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	-32.71%	-3.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.26%	-7.24%	+0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.60%	-3.91%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	2.69%	+0.06%

Volatility

LRGF vs. IWL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGF	IWL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	5.36%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	9.69%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	18.48%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.05%	17.17%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	18.06%	+0.24%