PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRGF vs. BKLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRGF vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LRGF having a 11.29% return and BKLC slightly higher at 11.76%.


LRGF

1D
0.18%
1M
6.67%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.73%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
23.10%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
14.11%

BKLC

1D
0.20%
1M
5.66%
YTD
11.76%
6M
12.13%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGF vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
11.29%16.48%26.59%25.85%-14.77%25.01%32.31%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
11.76%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and BKLC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.95

The correlation between LRGF and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

LRGF vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LRGF
BKLC

Technology

35.6%
38.0%

Financial Services

12.5%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.3%

Communication Services

8.2%
10.8%

Industrials

8.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
4.4%

Energy

3.7%
3.3%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.7%

Technology

LRGF
35.6%
BKLC
38.0%

Financial Services

LRGF
12.5%
BKLC
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LRGF
11.2%
BKLC
9.8%

Healthcare

LRGF
9.1%
BKLC
8.3%

Communication Services

LRGF
8.2%
BKLC
10.8%

Industrials

LRGF
8.1%
BKLC
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

LRGF
6.0%
BKLC
4.4%

Energy

LRGF
3.7%
BKLC
3.3%

Utilities

LRGF
2.3%
BKLC
2.5%

Basic Materials

LRGF
2.0%
BKLC
1.6%

Real Estate

LRGF
1.3%
BKLC
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRGF vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF
LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGF vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRGFBKLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.47

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

3.32

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.30

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.80

15.12

-2.31

LRGF vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGF and BKLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRGFBKLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.47

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.13

-0.43

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and BKLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRGFBKLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-26.14%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-9.10%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-19.05%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-26.14%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-5.27%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.99%

+0.15%

Volatility

LRGF vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRGFBKLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.88%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

9.10%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

12.08%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

17.16%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

17.45%

+0.86%

LRGF vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LRGF vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than BKLC's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.00%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
1.05%1.16%1.23%1.49%1.78%1.05%1.35%1.76%3.27%1.68%1.56%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LRGF and BKLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKLC has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to LRGF (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGF dropped -36.03% vs BKLC's -26.14%.

On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 14.74% vs 14.20% for LRGF. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 14.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LRGF.

LRGF has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 1.00% for BKLC.

LRGF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BKLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. LRGF tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LRGF and 0.00% for BKLC.

BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRGF and BKLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer