PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LRFC vs. VCSH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LRFC and VCSH is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

LRFC vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Logan Ridge Finance Corporation (LRFC) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
16.04%
1.59%
LRFC
VCSH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LRFC:

0.89

VCSH:

2.73

Sortino Ratio

LRFC:

1.69

VCSH:

4.23

Omega Ratio

LRFC:

1.21

VCSH:

1.55

Calmar Ratio

LRFC:

0.27

VCSH:

4.81

Martin Ratio

LRFC:

5.31

VCSH:

12.64

Ulcer Index

LRFC:

3.15%

VCSH:

0.47%

Daily Std Dev

LRFC:

18.74%

VCSH:

2.20%

Max Drawdown

LRFC:

-85.59%

VCSH:

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

LRFC:

-54.02%

VCSH:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRFC achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LRFC has underperformed VCSH with an annualized return of -7.06%, while VCSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.36% annualized return.


LRFC

YTD

-0.84%

1M

1.25%

6M

16.05%

1Y

16.24%

5Y*

-12.28%

10Y*

-7.06%

VCSH

YTD

1.00%

1M

0.83%

6M

1.58%

1Y

6.13%

5Y*

1.90%

10Y*

2.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRFC vs. VCSH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRFC is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRFC is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRFC is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRFC is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRFC is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRFC is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VCSH is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VCSH is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VCSH is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LRFC vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Logan Ridge Finance Corporation (LRFC) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LRFC, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.892.73
The chart of Sortino ratio for LRFC, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.694.23
The chart of Omega ratio for LRFC, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.211.55
The chart of Calmar ratio for LRFC, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.274.81
The chart of Martin ratio for LRFC, currently valued at 5.31, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.3112.64
LRFC
VCSH

The current LRFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRFC and VCSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.89
2.73
LRFC
VCSH

Dividends

LRFC vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

LRFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than VCSH's 4.00% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LRFC
Logan Ridge Finance Corporation
5.41%5.36%4.25%0.00%0.00%10.37%11.41%13.89%19.49%13.94%19.74%10.53%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.00%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.25%2.10%2.08%2.01%

Drawdowns

LRFC vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRFC drawdown since its inception was -85.59%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRFC and VCSH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-54.02%
0
LRFC
VCSH

Volatility

LRFC vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

Logan Ridge Finance Corporation (LRFC) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.50%. This indicates that LRFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.71%
0.50%
LRFC
VCSH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab