PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LRCX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LRCX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-26.43%
11.44%
LRCX
VOO

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 25.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 26.44%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.11% annualized return.


LRCX

YTD

-9.26%

1M

-3.12%

6M

-24.72%

1Y

1.76%

5Y (annualized)

22.43%

10Y (annualized)

26.44%

VOO

YTD

25.02%

1M

0.63%

6M

11.74%

1Y

32.35%

5Y (annualized)

15.50%

10Y (annualized)

13.11%

Key characteristics


LRCXVOO
Sharpe Ratio0.042.67
Sortino Ratio0.353.56
Omega Ratio1.051.50
Calmar Ratio0.053.85
Martin Ratio0.1017.51
Ulcer Index17.62%1.86%
Daily Std Dev42.24%12.23%
Max Drawdown-87.91%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-37.21%-1.76%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between LRCX and VOO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRCX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.042.67
The chart of Sortino ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.353.56
The chart of Omega ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.051.50
The chart of Calmar ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.053.85
The chart of Martin ratio for LRCX, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.1017.51
LRCX
VOO

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.04
2.67
LRCX
VOO

Dividends

LRCX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than VOO's 1.25% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
1.18%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%0.68%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.25%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-37.21%
-1.76%
LRCX
VOO

Volatility

LRCX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.09%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.22%
4.09%
LRCX
VOO