LRCX vs. LLY

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 25.57% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 26.44%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 29.39% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and LLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than LLY's 0.72% yield.

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and LLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 10.97%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.