PortfoliosLab logo
LQDW vs. GABF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDW and GABF is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

LQDW vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.59%
72.42%
LQDW
GABF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDW:

0.56

GABF:

0.71

Sortino Ratio

LQDW:

0.78

GABF:

1.10

Omega Ratio

LQDW:

1.12

GABF:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

LQDW:

0.54

GABF:

0.80

Martin Ratio

LQDW:

1.96

GABF:

3.39

Ulcer Index

LQDW:

1.43%

GABF:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

LQDW:

4.98%

GABF:

23.49%

Max Drawdown

LQDW:

-9.20%

GABF:

-20.86%

Current Drawdown

LQDW:

-3.01%

GABF:

-15.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDW achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -9.93% return.


LQDW

YTD

0.09%

1M

-2.25%

6M

-1.44%

1Y

2.81%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GABF

YTD

-9.93%

1M

-5.09%

6M

-4.92%

1Y

18.85%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDW vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDW has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for LQDW: current value is 0.34%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
LQDW: 0.34%
Expense ratio chart for GABF: current value is 0.10%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
GABF: 0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDW vs. GABF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDW is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDW is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDW is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDW is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDW is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDW is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GABF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GABF is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GABF is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GABF is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GABF is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GABF is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GABF is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDW vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
LQDW: 0.56
GABF: 0.71
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
LQDW: 0.78
GABF: 1.10
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
LQDW: 1.12
GABF: 1.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
LQDW: 0.54
GABF: 0.80
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDW, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
LQDW: 1.96
GABF: 3.39

The current LQDW Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the GABF Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDW and GABF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.56
0.71
LQDW
GABF

Dividends

LQDW vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

LQDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.68%, more than GABF's 4.65% yield.


Drawdowns

LQDW vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDW drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDW and GABF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-3.01%
-15.43%
LQDW
GABF

Volatility

LQDW vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) is 2.86%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 15.58%. This indicates that LQDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.86%
15.58%
LQDW
GABF