PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDW vs. GABF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LQDW vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LQDW vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
0.09%9.05%2.60%3.99%-6.78%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
-9.67%3.60%44.38%38.92%-4.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDW achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -9.67% return.


LQDW

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
0.09%
6M
1.24%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
10Y*

GABF

1D
0.28%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
-9.67%
6M
-10.83%
1Y
-3.40%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDW vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDW has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LQDW vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDW
LQDW Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LQDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDW Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDW Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GABF
GABF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDW vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDWGABFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

-0.15

+1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

-0.05

+1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.99

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

-0.18

+2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.21

-0.48

+8.69

LQDW vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDW and GABF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDWGABFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

-0.15

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.86

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between LQDW and GABF is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LQDW vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

LQDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.96%, more than GABF's 2.17% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
14.96%16.02%15.74%19.28%8.85%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
2.17%1.96%4.19%4.95%1.31%

Drawdowns

LQDW vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDW drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDW and GABF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDWGABFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-20.86%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-17.16%

+14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-14.11%

+12.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-4.64%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

6.49%

-5.73%

Volatility

LQDW vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) is 2.27%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that LQDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LQDWGABFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

5.73%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

13.62%

-10.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.44%

22.80%

-18.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.55%

20.69%

-15.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.55%

20.69%

-15.14%