PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LQDT vs. SBMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDT and SBMX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

LQDT vs. SBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Sberbank MOEX Russia Total Return ETF (SBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
68.47%
-10.83%
LQDT
SBMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDT:

2.52

SBMX:

-0.07

Sortino Ratio

LQDT:

4.03

SBMX:

0.06

Omega Ratio

LQDT:

1.55

SBMX:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

LQDT:

1.46

SBMX:

-0.05

Martin Ratio

LQDT:

24.57

SBMX:

-0.10

Ulcer Index

LQDT:

4.52%

SBMX:

14.00%

Daily Std Dev

LQDT:

44.10%

SBMX:

21.56%

Max Drawdown

LQDT:

-95.31%

SBMX:

-54.16%

Current Drawdown

LQDT:

-43.26%

SBMX:

-14.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than SBMX's 2.50% return.


LQDT

YTD

14.68%

1M

14.04%

6M

64.80%

1Y

109.21%

5Y*

47.64%

10Y*

16.99%

SBMX

YTD

2.50%

1M

2.50%

6M

2.97%

1Y

-0.11%

5Y*

5.30%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDT vs. SBMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDT is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDT is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDT is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SBMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SBMX is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SBMX is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SBMX is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SBMX is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SBMX is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SBMX is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDT vs. SBMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Sberbank MOEX Russia Total Return ETF (SBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.94-0.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 5.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.005.00-0.26
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.650.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 3.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.10-0.17
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDT, currently valued at 28.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0028.12-0.53
LQDT
SBMX

The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the SBMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and SBMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.94
-0.31
LQDT
SBMX

Dividends

LQDT vs. SBMX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LQDT nor SBMX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LQDT vs. SBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than SBMX's maximum drawdown of -54.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and SBMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.54%
-39.51%
LQDT
SBMX

Volatility

LQDT vs. SBMX - Volatility Comparison

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to Sberbank MOEX Russia Total Return ETF (SBMX) at 7.39%. This indicates that LQDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.95%
7.39%
LQDT
SBMX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab