LQDT vs. OBLG

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 81.29% return, which is significantly higher than OBLG's -55.43% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has outperformed OBLG with an annualized return of 14.24%, while OBLG has yielded a comparatively lower -53.05% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Oblong Inc. (OBLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the OBLG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and OBLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LQDT nor OBLG has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, roughly equal to the maximum OBLG drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and OBLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a higher volatility of 29.57% compared to Oblong Inc. (OBLG) at 21.03%. This indicates that LQDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Oblong Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.