LQDI vs. FXNAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LQDI (iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and FXNAX (Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund) are both funds - LQDI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while FXNAX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, LQDI returned 1.93%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FXNAX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LQDI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FXNAX.

Performance

LQDI vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.40% return.

LQDI

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 1.56%
• 1Y: 7.30%
• 3Y*: 5.84%
• 5Y*: 1.93%
• 10Y*: —

FXNAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.40%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: 5.37%
• 3Y*: 4.02%
• 5Y*: 0.12%
• 10Y*: 1.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQDI vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF	1.72%	8.84%	1.48%	8.85%	-15.33%	7.53%	11.82%	15.83%	-2.07%
FXNAX Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund	0.40%	7.14%	1.35%	5.82%	-13.55%	-2.10%	7.63%	8.50%	2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LQDI and FXNAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2018	0.63

The correlation between LQDI and FXNAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LQDI vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDI

LQDI Risk / Return Rank: 44
LQDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
LQDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LQDI Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LQDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
LQDI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FXNAX

FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 23
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDI vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LQDI	FXNAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.36	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.06	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.24	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	1.83	+0.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.71	5.61	+2.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LQDI vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDI and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LQDI	FXNAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	1.36	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.02	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.45	-0.05

Drawdowns

LQDI vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDI drawdown since its inception was -28.99%, which is greater than FXNAX's maximum drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDI and FXNAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQDI	FXNAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.99%	-19.51%	-9.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-2.94%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.27%	-6.16%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.67%	-18.54%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-2.89%	+2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.25%	-3.87%	-1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.96%	-0.01%

Volatility

LQDI vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) is 1.20%, while Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that LQDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LQDI	FXNAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	1.41%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.44%	2.82%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.97%	3.97%	+1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.18%	6.07%	+2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.84%	5.01%	+5.83%

LQDI vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LQDI vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

LQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than FXNAX's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXNAX Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund	3.71%	3.58%	3.40%	3.15%	1.81%	1.74%	2.92%	2.68%	2.74%	2.57%	2.76%	2.52%
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF	4.58%	4.46%	4.65%	3.98%	3.27%	2.42%	2.34%	3.26%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LQDI and FXNAX in my portfolio?

LQDI and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LQDI or FXNAX?

FXNAX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to LQDI (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDI dropped -28.99% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.